Don't need to double synchronize on simple map operations#14435
Merged
suneet-s merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom Jun 18, 2023
Merged
Don't need to double synchronize on simple map operations#14435suneet-s merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
suneet-s merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
kfaraz
reviewed
Jun 16, 2023
Contributor
kfaraz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense to me.
After these changes, would there be any operation in this class that is still synchronized on tasks?
Contributor
Author
no, i don't believe so |
kfaraz
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2023
10 tasks
GabrielCWT
pushed a commit
to GabrielCWT/druid
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2025
…map (apache#14643) Changes: - Fix race condition in KubernetesTaskRunner introduced by apache#14435 - Perform addition and removal from map inside a synchronized block - Update tests
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
We are using a lock around a concurrentHashMap for simple one line get/insert operations into the map
The concurrentHashMap guarantees that computeIfAbsent will only call the operation once if multiple threads attempt to call it concurrently, so this shouldn't be necessary.
We don't need the lock inside doTask either because doTask is called as a part of the operation in computeIfAbsent from either joinAsync or run for a single taskId. Because the map is concurrent, there will be one thread running doTask per taskId.
Release note
This PR has: