-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
Materialize scan results correctly when columns are not present in the segments #16619
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5f86bea
init commit
LakshSingla 886439b
Merge branch 'master' into missing-col-frames
LakshSingla a95807d
more tests
LakshSingla e66b948
add calcite tests
LakshSingla 591e25c
review comments
LakshSingla 180f9fe
review comments
LakshSingla 9d64ed4
fix tests
LakshSingla File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
note: I wonder why use a fastutil
IntList- if it gets iterated with aforeach; plainget?this could be moved into some method like
validateRow- that will naturally do a CSE of thecurrentRows.get(currentRowIndex)so that it will be only evaluated onceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No reason to use FastUtil IntList as such. I just thought it might be faster to create than an arraylist.
It is getting evaluated once here right? Unless I misinterpreted your comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this was just a note; this loop is validating one row; but to access that it has to do a function call
currentRows.get(currentRowIndex); which became part of the loop body - moving it into a method could make it clear that it works on a row - and it will naturally remove thecurrentRows.get(currentRowIndex)as that's the row :)