-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
Make ServiceMetricEvent immutable, do not allow null dimension values #18272
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4b335f3
Handle null dimension values in ServiceMetricEvent.copy
kfaraz 4845d7d
Fix test
kfaraz e6f1f6c
Do not allow null values, make event immutable
kfaraz 7c2ef00
Do not throw exception in addDimensionIfNotNull
kfaraz 713ee5a
Fix up tests
kfaraz 4717411
Clean up ServiceMetricEvent methods
kfaraz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ public void testDefaultQueryMetricsQuery() | |
| .context(ImmutableMap.of("testKey", "testValue")) | ||
| .build(); | ||
| queryMetrics.query(query); | ||
| queryMetrics.reportQueryTime(0).emit(serviceEmitter); | ||
| // No way to verify this right now since DefaultQueryMetrics implements a no-op for sqlQueryId(String) and queryId(String) | ||
| // This change is done to keep the code coverage tool happy by exercising the implementation | ||
| queryMetrics.sqlQueryId("dummy"); | ||
| queryMetrics.queryId("dummy"); | ||
| queryMetrics.reportQueryTime(0).emit(serviceEmitter); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why was this change needed? 🤔
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Need to emit the event after all the dimensions are set. Otherwise, this test would fail. |
||
| Map<String, Object> actualEvent = serviceEmitter.getEvents().get(0).toMap(); | ||
| Assert.assertEquals(13, actualEvent.size()); | ||
| Assert.assertTrue(actualEvent.containsKey("feed")); | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
public Builder setDimension(String dim, Object value)andpublic Builder setDimensionIfNotNull(String dim, Object value)could probably be collapsed into a single method I think? Any reason for keeping them separate? is it to avoid widespread changes across the codebase?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it keeps the patch small.
Also, the
setDimensionIfNotNullis essentially a short hand which does the null check for you, while the other throws exception on nulls.