-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
Fix bugs in query builders and in TimeBoundaryQuery.getFilter() #4131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
234a761
Add queryMetrics property to Query interface; Fix bugs and removed un…
leventov 07703ff
Fix a bug in TimeBoundaryQuery.getFilter() and remove TimeBoundaryQue…
leventov bac6957
Don't reassign query's queryMetrics if already present in CPUTimeMetr…
leventov 7210337
Add compatibility constructor to BaseQuery
leventov 9af2490
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into query-queryMetric…
leventov 3c15d1d
Remove Query.queryMetrics property
leventov 472d08b
Move nullToNoopLimitSpec() method to LimitSpec interface
leventov eb77aab
Rename GroupByQuery.applyLimit() to postProcess(); Fix inconsistencie…
leventov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR breaks compatibility of BaseQuery by refactoring this protected instance method into a static one. Is it a compatibility bug?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if BaseQuery is one of the "supposed to be stable" interfaces or if it's just Query / QueryRunner / QueryToolChest. Good question. We should probably have an annotation or something to make it clear.
I guess since all built-in queries extend BaseQuery, it's likely that extensions would too, so it would be kinder to them to keep compatibility there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@drcrallen asked me to keep compatibility of BaseQuery in earlier review of this PR: #4131 (comment)
I found this incompatibility because our extension broke :)
For annotation, there is an issue: #4044
Ok, I'll make a PR that fixes incompatibility
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR: #4241
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good.