Skip to content

Conversation

@leventov
Copy link
Member

@leventov leventov commented Nov 8, 2017

Because of #4390 and the problems with client: #4973 (comment), I agree now that it's better to downgrade, as was suggested here: #4390 (comment)

@b-slim
Copy link
Contributor

b-slim commented Nov 8, 2017

@leventov should we backport this?

@leventov
Copy link
Member Author

leventov commented Nov 8, 2017

If it passes tests...

@leventov leventov added this to the 0.11.0 milestone Nov 8, 2017
@leventov
Copy link
Member Author

leventov commented Nov 9, 2017

@b-slim @himanshug @drcrallen could you please review this PR?

@b-slim
Copy link
Contributor

b-slim commented Nov 9, 2017

👍 after testing

@b-slim
Copy link
Contributor

b-slim commented Nov 9, 2017

@leventov not sure why this PR has a design review tag? seems to me we are reverting to the known working version of Netty.

@gianm
Copy link
Contributor

gianm commented Nov 9, 2017

LGTM.

@gianm gianm merged commit 95154f9 into apache:master Nov 9, 2017
@leventov leventov deleted the netty-downgrade branch November 9, 2017 20:37
@himanshug
Copy link
Contributor

👍
a little late to review but we deployed this patch and can confirm that it fixes the problem mentioned in #4973 (comment)

gianm pushed a commit to gianm/druid that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2017
gianm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2017
leventov pushed a commit to metamx/druid that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2017
@leventov leventov mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants