-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
Part 2 of changes for SQL Compatible Null Handling #5958
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
abc7cbb
Part 2 of changes for SQL Compatible Null Handling
nishantmonu51 6a6d35a
Review comments - break lines longer than 120 characters
nishantmonu51 711fabe
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into null-handling-pr
nishantmonu51 cd2703e
review comments
nishantmonu51 d4a0584
review comments
nishantmonu51 dac0096
fix license
nishantmonu51 9071c2e
fix test failure
nishantmonu51 c839d63
fix CalciteQueryTest failure
nishantmonu51 aaa9d43
Null Handling - Review comments
nishantmonu51 7963038
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into null-handling-merge
nishantmonu51 7cbebdc
review comments
nishantmonu51 e1d37bd
Merge review comments after testing in another branch
nishantmonu51 6022648
review comments
nishantmonu51 7335a2f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into null-handling-pr
nishantmonu51 36c0dc8
fix checkstyle
nishantmonu51 6c2102f
fix checkstyle
nishantmonu51 4458b41
remove unrelated change
nishantmonu51 a458ade
fix test failure
nishantmonu51 71904cd
fix failing test
nishantmonu51 9fd19e9
fix travis failures
nishantmonu51 1437081
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/upstream/master' into null-hand…
nishantmonu51 312c5db
fix merge conflicts
nishantmonu51 2ae1007
Make StringLast and StringFirst aggregators nullable and fix travis f…
nishantmonu51 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wonder why we check this here instead of changing
evalLong()orevalDoubleto return a nullableLongorDouble, respectively. Is this to avoid boxing/unboxing? If so, I wonder how much it affects to the performance.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure about how much performance effect boxing/unboxing will have, in this form atleast the change is on safer side and does not affect performance for non-sql case.
We can run more benchmarks in a follow up PR and change this api to return boxed values if the performance diff is not much.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#5991
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks.