[VL] Allow the use of Gzip codec for shuffle compression#11242
Merged
philo-he merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom Dec 9, 2025
Merged
[VL] Allow the use of Gzip codec for shuffle compression#11242philo-he merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
philo-he merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI on x86 |
Member
Author
|
@marin-ma, could you please take a look? |
Contributor
|
+1 |
7d17ab4 to
20f6484
Compare
|
Run Gluten Clickhouse CI on x86 |
Member
Author
|
Friendly ping @marin-ma. Thanks. |
marin-ma
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2025
Contributor
marin-ma
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry for missing this. Thanks!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
We are testing QAT with Gzip, but found an exception was raised: Unsupported compression codec gzip. It seems a regression from #9356.
How was this patch tested?
Local test with QAT.