HIVE-28665: Iceberg: Upgrade iceberg version to 1.9.1#5846
HIVE-28665: Iceberg: Upgrade iceberg version to 1.9.1#5846deniskuzZ merged 30 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
|
@kasakrisz, please drop the following
|
iceberg/iceberg-handler/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/mr/InputFormatConfig.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
fa9c656 to
16da407
Compare
| import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; | ||
|
|
||
| public class HiveCatalog extends BaseMetastoreCatalog implements SupportsNamespaces, Configurable { | ||
| public class HiveCatalog extends BaseMetastoreViewCatalog |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is so nice. The lack of view support is one of the bottlenecks when I try HIVE-28059 with other query engines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@okumin, are you using RestCatalog locally? if yes, please suggest the default configs for the docker image: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/5834/files#diff-cfa8481579367e1e9127939f845eba4d2ee8c796d6858bcd0ca0a4b5fbfb8019R35-R42
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, but I'm still halfway and I don't have very concrete suggestions. I have not successfully integrated it with other query engines.
16da407 to
a7a1cbf
Compare
|
Should we upgrade parquet to 1.15.2 just to be in sync with iceberg 1.9.1? Let me know I can raise the PR for the same. |
@Aggarwal-Raghav |
a7a1cbf to
931bdec
Compare
| numFiles 2 | ||
| numPartitions 2 | ||
| numRows 6 | ||
| numRows 4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caused by apache/iceberg#11131 (comment)
Created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-29014
| #### A masked pattern was here #### | ||
| numFiles 1 | ||
| numRows 7 | ||
| numRows 6 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caused by apache/iceberg#11131 (comment)
Created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-29014
127743a to
85f7ca9
Compare
85f7ca9 to
8140ed1
Compare
8140ed1 to
0ed29d2
Compare
|



What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Backport patches from iceberg:
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Run existing and backported tests