Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
license-eye has totally checked 888 files.
| Valid | Invalid | Ignored | Fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 670 | 3 | 215 | 0 |
Click to see the invalid file list
- hugegraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/hugegraph/type/Nameable.java
- hugegraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/hugegraph/type/define/Cardinality.java
- hugegraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/hugegraph/util/StringEncoding.java
hugegraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/hugegraph/type/define/Cardinality.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
hugegraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/hugegraph/util/StringEncoding.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2100 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 68.70% 48.01% -20.69%
+ Complexity 979 379 -600
=============================================
Files 479 479
Lines 39655 39655
Branches 5578 5578
=============================================
- Hits 27243 19041 -8202
- Misses 9770 18485 +8715
+ Partials 2642 2129 -513
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
| // NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4d of The Apache License, | ||
| // Version 2.0, in this case for JanusGraph | ||
| // ------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
|
|
||
| JanusGraph | ||
| Copyright (C) 2002, 2016, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shall we add it in binary release NOTICE file?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, i have added it in binary release
hugegraph-dist/release-docs/LICENSE
Outdated
| (Apache License, Version 2.0) * Apache Log4j Core (org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core:2.17.1 - https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-core/) | ||
| (Apache License, Version 2.0) * Apache Log4j SLF4J Binding (org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j-impl:2.17.1 - https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-slf4j-impl/) | ||
| (Apache License, Version 2.0) * Apache Thrift (org.apache.thrift:libthrift:0.9.2 - http://thrift.apache.org) | ||
| (Apache License, Version 2.0) * JanusGraph (https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@WillemJiang
hi,
Our source code refers to the janusGraph source file, but doesn't refer the jar dependency.
I have modified the source license & notice and binary license & notice to declare it, but I'm a little unsure if i write the binary license in the write way. The binary artifact doesn't have java source file. We don't refer to the janusGraph's binary artifact (we only copy its source file, which becomes class file in binary artifact).
For example:
we source code refers to the A project a.java source file
- Wether the binary license needs to declare"a.class from https://githu.com/A"
- If we don't refer to A.jar (only source file), do we write "A (https://github.com/A" or "A (org.A:A:0.0.1 - https://github.com/A)"?
- If archive file path is different between source path and binary artifact, can we only copy source license to binary license?
I am looking forward to your suggestions to write these situations better.
Thanks a lot
| // NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4d of The Apache License, | ||
| // Version 2.0, in this case for JanusGraph | ||
| // ------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
|
|
||
| JanusGraph | ||
| Copyright (C) 2002, 2016, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
reference: #1632