Skip to content

Conversation

@singhpk234
Copy link
Contributor

About the change

Add missing void transform to spec, it seems like there are multiple missing transforms i will while adding others, this is required for Read Restriction PR #13879 to have stuff produce null as a transform

@sfc-gh-prsingh sfc-gh-prsingh force-pushed the feature/add-void-transform branch from 1cc5aac to 7fde4b3 Compare December 6, 2025 04:32
type: string
example:
- "identity"
- "void"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @singhpk234! Looks like the Transform model already covers void since it’s just a string and not an enum.

There’s still a good case for calling it out for clarity, or even switching the list to an enum later if it helps with server side handling.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants