This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
ELU: change greater than equal to strict greater.#854
Merged
antinucleon merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom Dec 8, 2015
Merged
ELU: change greater than equal to strict greater.#854antinucleon merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
antinucleon merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Following the discussion in [1] and the original implementation in [2]. In the original implementation > 0 was used not as reported in the paper. [1] BVLC/caffe#3388 [2] untom/binet@2c8a6bd
Contributor
|
I think with BN, activation function is less important. But let's merge first. |
antinucleon
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2015
ELU: change greater than equal to strict greater.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following the discussion in [1] and the original implementation in [2].
In the original implementation > 0 was used not as reported in the
paper.
[1] BVLC/caffe#3388
[2] untom/binet@2c8a6bd