Skip to content

arm: we should use tcb->xcp.regs instead of up_current_regs() #13598

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
masayuki2009 merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

arm: we should use tcb->xcp.regs instead of up_current_regs() #13598

masayuki2009 merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

@hujun260
Copy link
Contributor

@hujun260 hujun260 commented Sep 25, 2024

Summary

we should use tcb->xcp.regs instead of up_current_regs() as the basis for judging whether to call restore_critical_section.
This commit fixes the regression from #13444

Impact

arm6-m
arm7-m
arm8-m

Testing

ostest

@hujun260
arm: we should use tcb->xcp.regs instead of up_current_regs() as the …
96398aa 
…basis for judging whether to call restore_critical_section.

This commit fixes the regression from apache#13444

Signed-off-by: hujun5 <hujun5@xiaomi.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added Arch: arm Issues related to ARM (32-bit) architecture Size: XS The size of the change in this PR is very small labels Sep 25, 2024
@hujun260 hujun260 mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
Merged
@masayuki2009
Copy link
Contributor

masayuki2009 commented Sep 25, 2024

ostest

@hujun260
Which configuration did you use for the testing?

@hujun260
Copy link
Contributor Author

hujun260 commented Sep 25, 2024

ostest

@hujun260 Which configuration did you use for the testing?

raspberrypi-pico:smp

@masayuki2009 masayuki2009 merged commit efdb432 into apache:master Sep 25, 2024
@hujun260 hujun260 deleted the apache_12 branch September 29, 2024 03:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@masayuki2009 masayuki2009 Awaiting requested review from masayuki2009

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Arch: arm Issues related to ARM (32-bit) architecture Size: XS The size of the change in this PR is very small

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@hujun260 @masayuki2009