Skip to content

Conversation

@OceanfromXiaomi
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Merge cd_error and rx_overflow into rx_error so the error could dispath to each client without interference

Impact

Testing

test with the borad uesd cortex-M7 architecture.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Size: M The size of the change in this PR is medium label Sep 26, 2024
so the error could dispath to each client without interference

Signed-off-by: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang@xiaomi.com>
@nuttxpr
Copy link

nuttxpr commented Sep 26, 2024

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

This Pull Request (PR) summary does not meet the NuttX requirements fully. Here's a breakdown:

What's good:

  • Summary: You clearly state the why (merging errors for better dispatch) and what (merging cd_error, rx_overflow into rx_error).
  • Testing: You mention the target (Cortex-M7) but need more specifics.

What needs improvement:

  • Summary:
    • How: Explain the mechanism of merging and dispatching. Code examples or diagrams would be helpful.
    • Related Issues: Link any relevant NuttX issues to provide context.
  • Impact: You've left this section entirely blank! Address all points:
    • New/Changed Features: Does this purely improve internal error handling, or are there user-facing changes?
    • User Impact: Will users need to change their code to handle the new error?
    • Build Impact: Any changes to build system, dependencies, etc.?
    • Hardware Impact: Does it only affect the Cortex-M7, or are there broader implications?
    • Documentation: Does this change require documentation updates?
    • Security: Could this merge have any security implications (positive or negative)?
    • Compatibility: Any impact on backward compatibility with older NuttX versions?
  • Testing:
    • Build Host: Specify your development environment (OS, compiler, versions).
    • Target Details: Provide the exact board and configuration used for testing.
    • Logs: Include relevant before and after logs to demonstrate the change's effect.

Concise Feedback:

The PR summary is a good start but lacks crucial details for reviewers to understand the change's impact. Complete the "Impact" section and provide specific testing information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Size: M The size of the change in this PR is medium

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants