AUTHORS: add missing authors with submitted ICLA

[jerpelea]

Summary
add the missing authors that have submitted ICLA

Impact
Authors

Testing
None

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No. This PR does not adequately meet the NuttX requirements. While it attempts to address the summary and impact sections, it is far too brief and lacks critical information. The testing section is completely insufficient.

Here's why it's insufficient and what needs to be added:

• Summary: "add the missing authors that have submitted ICLA" is vague. Which authors? Where are they missing from? What part of the codebase is affected? How were they added? A related issue number should be included if this addresses a reported problem.

• Impact: Simply stating "Authors" isn't helpful. Explain the impact. Does this affect code ownership? Does it change anything functionally? All the "NO/YES" questions in the template must be answered individually.

• Testing: "None" is unacceptable. Even if the change is purely administrative (like adding authors to a file), you need to demonstrate that the change was made correctly. For example, show the relevant section of the file before and after the change. If the authors are being added to allow them to be correctly credited for code contributions, show that the correct authors are now associated with their contributions (e.g., through git blame or similar).

Example of how to improve this PR description:

Summary: This PR adds the following authors, who have submitted ICLAs, to the AUTHORS file: John Doe and Jane Smith. They were previously missing, preventing them from being properly acknowledged for their contributions to the networking subsystem (specifically, the TCP/IP stack implementation). This addresses issue #123.

Impact:

• Is new feature added? NO
• Is existing feature changed? NO
• Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? NO
• Impact on build (will build process change)? NO
• Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? NO
• Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)? YES (The AUTHORS file has been updated.)
• Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO
• Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? NO
• Anything else to consider? NO

Testing:

Build Host(s): Linux, x86_64, GCC 9.4.0
Target(s): N/A (This change only affects documentation.)

Testing logs before change (excerpt from AUTHORS):

... existing authors ...

Testing logs after change (excerpt from AUTHORS):

... existing authors ...
John Doe <john.doe@example.com>
Jane Smith <jane.smith@example.com>

By providing this level of detail, reviewers can quickly understand the change, its impact, and verify that it's correct. This will significantly speed up the review process.