HDDS-13354. Run multitenancy acceptance test with Ranger #8722
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
smengcl
approved these changes
Jul 9, 2025
Contributor
smengcl
left a comment
smengcl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm. Thanks @adoroszlai !
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @smengcl for the review. |
jojochuang
pushed a commit
to jojochuang/ozone
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
--om-service-idfor OM service ID option inozone admin om updateranger, so that we can use$OM_HA_PARAM(which is set to--om-service-id <service>for OM HA environment)ozone-secure-tenant.robotto allow running it with both real Ranger (inozonesecure-haenv.) and without (inozonesecureenv.):RANGER_ENDPOINT_URLto distinguish between the two casestoString()for some value classes inMultiTenantAccessControllerfor better debug${testuser}to${user}inkinit.robot, becauseKinit test usersets${TEST_USER}, and variable names in Robot are case-insensitive and ignore underscores. Thus,${testuser}and${TEST_USER}are the same, i.e. the keyword overwriteskinit.robot's variable.https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-13354
How was this patch tested?
Existing test.
With Ranger:
https://github.com/adoroszlai/ozone/actions/runs/16004570857/job/45148864306#step:13:1063
Without Ranger:
https://github.com/adoroszlai/ozone/actions/runs/16004570857/job/45148864252#step:13:376