Upgrade bk version to resolve the BouncyCatle issue#11759
Merged
codelipenghui merged 3 commits intoapache:masterfrom Aug 24, 2021
Merged
Upgrade bk version to resolve the BouncyCatle issue#11759codelipenghui merged 3 commits intoapache:masterfrom
codelipenghui merged 3 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
--- Fixes apache#10937 *Motivation* The previours bk version was introduce an incompatible issue with BouncyCastle FIPS. BookKeeper already fix this and we should upgrade the version to resolve the issue. For more information: apache#10937 *Modifications* Upgrade bk to 4.14.2
zymap
added
area/dependency
codelipenghui
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2021
Contributor
|
@zymap license check failed, PTAL |
hangc0276
reviewed
Aug 24, 2021
| * RocksDB - org.rocksdb-rocksdbjni-6.10.2.jar | ||
| * Google Error Prone Annotations - com.google.errorprone-error_prone_annotations-2.5.1.jar | ||
| * Apache Thrifth - org.apache.thrift-libthrift-0.12.0.jar | ||
| * Apache Thrifth - org.apache.thrift-libthrift-0.14.2.jar |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it is a dependency of DistributedLog, used by the StreamStorage Service, used by Pulsar Functions
dlg99
pushed a commit
to dlg99/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2021
Fixes apache#10937 *Motivation* The previours bk version was introduce an incompatible issue with BouncyCastle FIPS. BookKeeper already fix this and we should upgrade the version to resolve the issue. For more information: apache#10937 *Modifications* Upgrade bk to 4.14.2
bharanic-dev
pushed a commit
to bharanic-dev/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
Fixes apache#10937 *Motivation* The previours bk version was introduce an incompatible issue with BouncyCastle FIPS. BookKeeper already fix this and we should upgrade the version to resolve the issue. For more information: apache#10937 *Modifications* Upgrade bk to 4.14.2
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #10937
Motivation
The previours bk version was introduce an incompatible issue
with BouncyCastle FIPS. BookKeeper already fix this and we
should upgrade the version to resolve the issue.
For more information: #10937
Modifications
Upgrade bk to 4.14.2
(If this PR fixes a github issue, please add
Fixes #<xyz>.)Fixes #
(or if this PR is one task of a github issue, please add
Master Issue: #<xyz>to link to the master issue.)Master Issue: #
Motivation
Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve.
Modifications
Describe the modifications you've done.
Verifying this change
(Please pick either of the following options)
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
(or)
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).
(or)
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
(example:)
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
If
yeswas chosen, please highlight the changesDocumentation
For contributor
For this PR, do we need to update docs?
If yes, please update docs or create a follow-up issue if you need help.
If no, please explain why.
For committer
For this PR, do we need to update docs?
If yes,
if you update docs in this PR, label this PR with the
doclabel.if you plan to update docs later, label this PR with the
doc-requiredlabel.if you need help on updating docs, create a follow-up issue with the
doc-requiredlabel.If no, label this PR with the
no-need-doclabel and explain why.