[improve][admin] Put validateTopicOwnershipAsync before validateTopicOperationAsync

[Technoboy-]

Motivation

Maybe for mistake or other reason, some patches have put validateTopicOperationAsync first then validateTopicOwnershipAsync. Related patches : #13880, #13878, #14045, #15120, #13845, #13805
If the topic ownership does not belong to this broker, it will redirect to another broker, and validateTopicOperationAsync is useless in this case. so we should put validateTopicOwnershipAsync before validateTopicOperationAsync.

Documentation

• no-need-doc

[lhotari]

Motivation

Put validateTopicOwnershipAsync before validateTopicOperationAsync to decrease validateTopicOperationAsync one time.

@Technoboy- please improve the description. What does this mean?

It looks like this is an improvement for a recent change #15120. It would be worth cross-referencing that in the description to provide more context.

[Technoboy-]

Motivation

Put validateTopicOwnershipAsync before validateTopicOperationAsync to decrease validateTopicOperationAsync one time.

@Technoboy- please improve the description. What does this mean?

It looks like this is an improvement for a recent change #15120. It would be worth cross-referencing that in the description to provide more context.

Yes, it's one of the patches.

[lhotari]

Yes, it's one of the patches.

Please be more specific and reference the other patches if you have that information. One reason why this is important is when someone is cherry-picking one of those patches, they know that the patch isn't complete and should include this change.

It's better to provide more context in pull request descriptions since reviewers need the context information for reviewing the PR. Every reviewer has to lookup the context on their own if you don't provide it. That's a major waste of time which could easily be eliminated by providing better descriptions and more context.

[Technoboy-]

Yes, it's one of the patches.

Please be more specific and reference the other patches if you have that information. One reason why this is important is when someone is cherry-picking one of those patches, they know that the patch isn't complete and should include this change.

It's better to provide more context in pull request descriptions since reviewers need the context information for reviewing the PR. Every reviewer has to lookup the context on their own if you don't provide it. That's a major waste of time which could easily be eliminated by providing better descriptions and more context.

Yes, agree. I will update the description later.

[lhotari]

LGTM, good work @Technoboy-