Skip to content

Conversation

@shibd
Copy link
Member

@shibd shibd commented May 16, 2022

Motivation

See PIP #14365 and change tracker #15043.

Make NamespacesBase getAutoTopicCreation / setAutoTopicCreation / removeAutoTopicCreation methods to pure async.

Documentation

  • no-need-doc
    (Please explain why)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs label May 16, 2022
@shibd shibd changed the title Make some operation auto topic creation in Namespaces async. [improve][broker] Make some operation auto topic creation in Namespaces async. May 16, 2022
@Technoboy- Technoboy- added this to the 2.11.0 milestone May 18, 2022
internalSetAutoTopicCreationAsync(null)
.thenAccept(__ -> {
log.info("[{}] Successfully remove autoTopicCreation on namespace {}", clientAppId());
asyncResponse.resume(Response.noContent().build());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

log.info("[{}] Successfully remove autoTopicCreation on namespace {}", clientAppId()) ->
log.info("[{}] Successfully remove autoTopicCreation on namespace {}", clientAppId(), namespaceName);

@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 18, 2022

@Technoboy- Thanks for your review. Fixed, PTAL.

@Technoboy- Technoboy- added type/enhancement The enhancements for the existing features or docs. e.g. reduce memory usage of the delayed messages area/admin labels May 19, 2022
@Technoboy-
Copy link
Contributor

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@shibd shibd force-pushed the async_auto_topic branch from c6b1b37 to 572fc3c Compare May 23, 2022 05:18
@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 23, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

1 similar comment
@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 24, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@mattisonchao
Copy link
Member

@shibd Looks like this fix is missing, is it rebase issue?
#15653

@shibd
Copy link
Member Author

shibd commented May 24, 2022

@mattisonchao @nodece Thanks for your review. Sorry, I miss the change of #15653 when rebasing. All suggest fixed, Please help review again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/admin doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs type/enhancement The enhancements for the existing features or docs. e.g. reduce memory usage of the delayed messages

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants