[Branch-2.11] Revert [improve][broker] Require authRole is proxyRole to set originalPrincipal(#19455)

[hangc0276]

This reverts commit c7eabc9.

Motivation

PR #19455 introduced break change and has been cherry-picked to release branch-2.11. It will lead to users upgrading to the new release version authenticate failed.

Modifications

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

• Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
• Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
• The public API
• The schema
• The default values of configurations
• The threading model
• The binary protocol
• The REST endpoints
• The admin CLI options
• The metrics
• Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

[nodece]

LGTM

[hangc0276]

We need to revert more commits related to this PR.

[michaeljmarshall]

We need to revert more commits related to this PR.

Even if the PMC decides that the right decision is to "revert this behavior change", we should not revert this whole commit. Only a few lines of code are actually under dispute.

[michaeljmarshall]

These are the lines that are under question.

[codelipenghui]

We have an acceptable solution for now. So that we don't need to revert this change, just push a fix to the release branches.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/q1k1krfjr8njdf8t3sy1ht4vg67s4x71 the discussion thread.

And @michaeljmarshall message me in Slack, he will open PR to fix it.

Thanks @hangc0276 and @michaeljmarshall

[michaeljmarshall]

#19830 should supersede this PR, so I am going to close this for now.