Skip to content

Conversation

@cpoerschke
Copy link
Contributor

@cpoerschke cpoerschke commented Aug 23, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@dsmiley dsmiley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've not seen a Solr PR that depends on a Lucene PR that is unmerged :-). It's getting ahead of ourselves. Is the point to see if there are API problems in Solr code?

@cpoerschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've not seen a Solr PR that depends on a Lucene PR that is unmerged :-). It's getting ahead of ourselves. Is the point to see if there are API problems in Solr code?

Yes, to gauge what this might look like from the Solr/application perspective, e.g.

  • it seems straightforward to support,
  • (perhaps) clarifies that (currently) there is no "how many" number associated with the seed query, and
  • the seed query will need a parameter name, obviously.

@cpoerschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing in favour of #3705

@cpoerschke cpoerschke closed this Sep 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants