[SPARK-39851][SQL] Improve join stats estimation if one side can keep uniqueness #39923
+1,936
−2,220
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wangyum
reviewed
Feb 15, 2023
.../main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/JoinEstimation.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
wangyum
approved these changes
Feb 16, 2023
Member
|
cc @cloud-fan |
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2023
dongjoon-hyun
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2023
… uniqueness
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves join stats estimation if one side can keep uniqueness(The distinct keys of the children of the join are a subset of the join keys). A common case is:
```sql
SELECT i_item_sk ss_item_sk
FROM item,
(SELECT DISTINCT iss.i_brand_id brand_id,
iss.i_class_id class_id,
iss.i_category_id category_id
FROM item iss) x
WHERE i_brand_id = brand_id
AND i_class_id = class_id
AND i_category_id = category_id
```
In this case, the row count of the join will definitely not expand.
Before this PR:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [i_item_sk#4 AS ss_item_sk#54], Statistics(sizeInBytes=370.8 MiB, rowCount=3.24E+7)
+- Join Inner, (((i_brand_id#11 = brand_id#51) AND (i_class_id#13 = class_id#52)) AND (i_category_id#15 = category_id#53)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=1112.3 MiB, rowCount=3.24E+7)
:- Project [i_item_sk#4, i_brand_id#11, i_class_id#13, i_category_id#15], Statistics(sizeInBytes=4.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
: +- Filter ((isnotnull(i_brand_id#11) AND isnotnull(i_class_id#13)) AND isnotnull(i_category_id#15)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=84.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
: +- Relation spark_catalog.default.item[i_item_sk#4,i_item_id#5,i_rec_start_date#6,i_rec_end_date#7,i_item_desc#8,i_current_price#9,i_wholesale_cost#10,i_brand_id#11,i_brand#12,i_class_id#13,i_class#14,i_category_id#15,i_category#16,i_manufact_id#17,i_manufact#18,i_size#19,i_formulation#20,i_color#21,i_units#22,i_container#23,i_manager_id#24,i_product_name#25] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=85.2 MiB, rowCount=2.04E+5)
+- Aggregate [brand_id#51, class_id#52, category_id#53], [brand_id#51, class_id#52, category_id#53], Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.6 MiB, rowCount=1.37E+5)
+- Project [i_brand_id#62 AS brand_id#51, i_class_id#64 AS class_id#52, i_category_id#66 AS category_id#53], Statistics(sizeInBytes=3.9 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Filter ((isnotnull(i_brand_id#62) AND isnotnull(i_class_id#64)) AND isnotnull(i_category_id#66)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=84.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Relation spark_catalog.default.item[i_item_sk#55,i_item_id#56,i_rec_start_date#57,i_rec_end_date#58,i_item_desc#59,i_current_price#60,i_wholesale_cost#61,i_brand_id#62,i_brand#63,i_class_id#64,i_class#65,i_category_id#66,i_category#67,i_manufact_id#68,i_manufact#69,i_size#70,i_formulation#71,i_color#72,i_units#73,i_container#74,i_manager_id#75,i_product_name#76] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=85.2 MiB, rowCount=2.04E+5)
```
After this PR:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [i_item_sk#4 AS ss_item_sk#54], Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.3 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Join Inner, (((i_brand_id#11 = brand_id#51) AND (i_class_id#13 = class_id#52)) AND (i_category_id#15 = category_id#53)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=7.0 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
:- Project [i_item_sk#4, i_brand_id#11, i_class_id#13, i_category_id#15], Statistics(sizeInBytes=4.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
: +- Filter ((isnotnull(i_brand_id#11) AND isnotnull(i_class_id#13)) AND isnotnull(i_category_id#15)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=84.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
: +- Relation spark_catalog.default.item[i_item_sk#4,i_item_id#5,i_rec_start_date#6,i_rec_end_date#7,i_item_desc#8,i_current_price#9,i_wholesale_cost#10,i_brand_id#11,i_brand#12,i_class_id#13,i_class#14,i_category_id#15,i_category#16,i_manufact_id#17,i_manufact#18,i_size#19,i_formulation#20,i_color#21,i_units#22,i_container#23,i_manager_id#24,i_product_name#25] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=85.2 MiB, rowCount=2.04E+5)
+- Aggregate [brand_id#51, class_id#52, category_id#53], [brand_id#51, class_id#52, category_id#53], Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.6 MiB, rowCount=1.37E+5)
+- Project [i_brand_id#62 AS brand_id#51, i_class_id#64 AS class_id#52, i_category_id#66 AS category_id#53], Statistics(sizeInBytes=3.9 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Filter ((isnotnull(i_brand_id#62) AND isnotnull(i_class_id#64)) AND isnotnull(i_category_id#66)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=84.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Relation spark_catalog.default.item[i_item_sk#55,i_item_id#56,i_rec_start_date#57,i_rec_end_date#58,i_item_desc#59,i_current_price#60,i_wholesale_cost#61,i_brand_id#62,i_brand#63,i_class_id#64,i_class#65,i_category_id#66,i_category#67,i_manufact_id#68,i_manufact#69,i_size#70,i_formulation#71,i_color#72,i_units#73,i_container#74,i_manager_id#75,i_product_name#76] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=85.2 MiB, rowCount=2.04E+5)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Plan more broadcast joins to improve query performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test and TPC-DS benchmark test.
SQL Before this PR(Seconds) After this PR(Seconds)
q14a 187 164
Closes #39923 from wankunde/SPARK-39851.
Lead-authored-by: wankunde <wankunde@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Kun Wan <wankun@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1c0bd1f)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Member
Member
|
Thank you @dongjoon-hyun. |
snmvaughan
pushed a commit
to snmvaughan/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2023
… uniqueness
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves join stats estimation if one side can keep uniqueness(The distinct keys of the children of the join are a subset of the join keys). A common case is:
```sql
SELECT i_item_sk ss_item_sk
FROM item,
(SELECT DISTINCT iss.i_brand_id brand_id,
iss.i_class_id class_id,
iss.i_category_id category_id
FROM item iss) x
WHERE i_brand_id = brand_id
AND i_class_id = class_id
AND i_category_id = category_id
```
In this case, the row count of the join will definitely not expand.
Before this PR:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [i_item_sk#4 AS ss_item_sk#54], Statistics(sizeInBytes=370.8 MiB, rowCount=3.24E+7)
+- Join Inner, (((i_brand_id#11 = brand_id#51) AND (i_class_id#13 = class_id#52)) AND (i_category_id#15 = category_id#53)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=1112.3 MiB, rowCount=3.24E+7)
:- Project [i_item_sk#4, i_brand_id#11, i_class_id#13, i_category_id#15], Statistics(sizeInBytes=4.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
: +- Filter ((isnotnull(i_brand_id#11) AND isnotnull(i_class_id#13)) AND isnotnull(i_category_id#15)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=84.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
: +- Relation spark_catalog.default.item[i_item_sk#4,i_item_id#5,i_rec_start_date#6,i_rec_end_date#7,i_item_desc#8,i_current_price#9,i_wholesale_cost#10,i_brand_id#11,i_brand#12,i_class_id#13,i_class#14,i_category_id#15,i_category#16,i_manufact_id#17,i_manufact#18,i_size#19,i_formulation#20,i_color#21,i_units#22,i_container#23,i_manager_id#24,i_product_name#25] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=85.2 MiB, rowCount=2.04E+5)
+- Aggregate [brand_id#51, class_id#52, category_id#53], [brand_id#51, class_id#52, category_id#53], Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.6 MiB, rowCount=1.37E+5)
+- Project [i_brand_id#62 AS brand_id#51, i_class_id#64 AS class_id#52, i_category_id#66 AS category_id#53], Statistics(sizeInBytes=3.9 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Filter ((isnotnull(i_brand_id#62) AND isnotnull(i_class_id#64)) AND isnotnull(i_category_id#66)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=84.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Relation spark_catalog.default.item[i_item_sk#55,i_item_id#56,i_rec_start_date#57,i_rec_end_date#58,i_item_desc#59,i_current_price#60,i_wholesale_cost#61,i_brand_id#62,i_brand#63,i_class_id#64,i_class#65,i_category_id#66,i_category#67,i_manufact_id#68,i_manufact#69,i_size#70,i_formulation#71,i_color#72,i_units#73,i_container#74,i_manager_id#75,i_product_name#76] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=85.2 MiB, rowCount=2.04E+5)
```
After this PR:
```
== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Project [i_item_sk#4 AS ss_item_sk#54], Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.3 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Join Inner, (((i_brand_id#11 = brand_id#51) AND (i_class_id#13 = class_id#52)) AND (i_category_id#15 = category_id#53)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=7.0 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
:- Project [i_item_sk#4, i_brand_id#11, i_class_id#13, i_category_id#15], Statistics(sizeInBytes=4.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
: +- Filter ((isnotnull(i_brand_id#11) AND isnotnull(i_class_id#13)) AND isnotnull(i_category_id#15)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=84.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
: +- Relation spark_catalog.default.item[i_item_sk#4,i_item_id#5,i_rec_start_date#6,i_rec_end_date#7,i_item_desc#8,i_current_price#9,i_wholesale_cost#10,i_brand_id#11,i_brand#12,i_class_id#13,i_class#14,i_category_id#15,i_category#16,i_manufact_id#17,i_manufact#18,i_size#19,i_formulation#20,i_color#21,i_units#22,i_container#23,i_manager_id#24,i_product_name#25] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=85.2 MiB, rowCount=2.04E+5)
+- Aggregate [brand_id#51, class_id#52, category_id#53], [brand_id#51, class_id#52, category_id#53], Statistics(sizeInBytes=2.6 MiB, rowCount=1.37E+5)
+- Project [i_brand_id#62 AS brand_id#51, i_class_id#64 AS class_id#52, i_category_id#66 AS category_id#53], Statistics(sizeInBytes=3.9 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Filter ((isnotnull(i_brand_id#62) AND isnotnull(i_class_id#64)) AND isnotnull(i_category_id#66)), Statistics(sizeInBytes=84.6 MiB, rowCount=2.02E+5)
+- Relation spark_catalog.default.item[i_item_sk#55,i_item_id#56,i_rec_start_date#57,i_rec_end_date#58,i_item_desc#59,i_current_price#60,i_wholesale_cost#61,i_brand_id#62,i_brand#63,i_class_id#64,i_class#65,i_category_id#66,i_category#67,i_manufact_id#68,i_manufact#69,i_size#70,i_formulation#71,i_color#72,i_units#73,i_container#74,i_manager_id#75,i_product_name#76] parquet, Statistics(sizeInBytes=85.2 MiB, rowCount=2.04E+5)
```
### Why are the changes needed?
Plan more broadcast joins to improve query performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Unit test and TPC-DS benchmark test.
SQL Before this PR(Seconds) After this PR(Seconds)
q14a 187 164
Closes apache#39923 from wankunde/SPARK-39851.
Lead-authored-by: wankunde <wankunde@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Kun Wan <wankun@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1c0bd1f)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves join stats estimation if one side can keep uniqueness(The distinct keys of the children of the join are a subset of the join keys). A common case is:
In this case, the row count of the join will definitely not expand.
Before this PR:
After this PR:
Why are the changes needed?
Plan more broadcast joins to improve query performance.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Unit test and TPC-DS benchmark test.
SQL Before this PR(Seconds) After this PR(Seconds)
q14a 187 164