Skip to content

[SPARK-49410][SQL][TESTS] Update collation benchmarks#47893

Closed
uros-db wants to merge 5 commits intoapache:masterfrom
uros-db:update-benchmarks
Closed

[SPARK-49410][SQL][TESTS] Update collation benchmarks#47893
uros-db wants to merge 5 commits intoapache:masterfrom
uros-db:update-benchmarks

Conversation

@uros-db
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@uros-db uros-db commented Aug 27, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Updating collation benchmarks to compute relative time, instead of relative speed. Also, re-run all collation benchmarks (after introducing various perf improvements as part of the recent collation effort).

Why are the changes needed?

Relative speed is displayed in format: "x0.0" for collations that are slower than the referent collation (UTF8_BINARY).

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please regenerate and attach the result, @uros-db .

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun changed the title [SPARK-49410][SQL] Update collation benchmarks [SPARK-49410][SQL][TESTS] Update collation benchmarks Aug 27, 2024
Comment thread core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/benchmark/Benchmark.scala Outdated
@MaxGekk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

MaxGekk commented Aug 28, 2024

@uros-db Please, regenerate benchmark results for Java 17/21, see:

Comment thread core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/benchmark/Benchmark.scala Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@MaxGekk MaxGekk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@uros-db Please, regenerate benchmark results after changing the headers.

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

MaxGekk commented Aug 29, 2024

+1, LGTM. Merging to master.
Thank you, @uros-db and @dongjoon-hyun for review.

@MaxGekk MaxGekk closed this in 1e67659 Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants