Skip to content

Conversation

@BryanCutler
Copy link
Member

Added check for positive block size with a note that -1 for auto-configuring is not supported

@BryanCutler BryanCutler changed the title [SPARK-8400] [ML] Added check for positive block size [SPARK-8400] [ML] Added check in ml.ALS for positive block size parameter setting Aug 21, 2015
@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Aug 21, 2015

Seems fine to me.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 21, 2015

Test build #1680 timed out for PR 8363 at commit a231c96 after a configured wait of 120m.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 24, 2015

Test build #1683 has finished for PR 8363 at commit a231c96.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@BryanCutler
Copy link
Member Author

Not sure why the last test failed, maybe retest once more?

cc @mengxr

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 25, 2015

Test build #1690 timed out for PR 8363 at commit a231c96 after a configured wait of 120m.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 25, 2015

Test build #1691 has finished for PR 8363 at commit a231c96.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2015
…eter setting

Added check for positive block size with a note that -1 for auto-configuring is not supported

Author: Bryan Cutler <bjcutler@us.ibm.com>

Closes #8363 from BryanCutler/ml.ALS-neg-blocksize-8400-1.3.
@feynmanliang
Copy link
Contributor

Can we close this PR since it's merged?

@BryanCutler BryanCutler deleted the ml.ALS-neg-blocksize-8400-1.3 branch October 29, 2015 21:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants