Skip to content

[Fuzzing] add cifuzz#10462

Merged
shukitchan merged 4 commits intoapache:masterfrom
0x34d:cifuzz
Oct 4, 2023
Merged

[Fuzzing] add cifuzz#10462
shukitchan merged 4 commits intoapache:masterfrom
0x34d:cifuzz

Conversation

@0x34d
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@0x34d 0x34d commented Sep 19, 2023

Add cifuzz for Continuous Integration of fuzzing in PR.

@shukitchan shukitchan self-assigned this Sep 19, 2023
@shukitchan shukitchan added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Sep 19, 2023
@shukitchan shukitchan self-requested a review September 19, 2023 06:42
Signed-off-by: Arjun Singh <ajsinghyadav00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arjun Singh <ajsinghyadav00@gmail.com>
@github-advanced-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@0x34d
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

0x34d commented Sep 28, 2023

@shukitchan can you merge?

@shukitchan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A couple points to discuss:

  1. In this early stage, we don't want the PR to be unmergeable if it is failing the cifuzz. Are you ok with that? We can check later on if we want to change that or not
  2. The run took quite a while and it may be taking quite some resources. I am under the impression that all ASF shares some resources for running github actions and we may not want to run an action that took too much resources. I am checking with infrastructure team first.

@0x34d
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

0x34d commented Sep 29, 2023

  1. In this early stage, we don't want the PR to be unmergeable if it is failing the cifuzz. Are you ok with that? We can check later on if we want to change that or not

I think this is very normal; you can set aside the build failure. If there is an actual bug in the PR, you can try to fix it.
On that note, I think I have to make some changes in build.sh.

The run took quite a while and it may be taking quite some resources. I am under the impression that all ASF shares some resources for running github actions and we may not want to run an action that took too much resources. I am checking with infrastructure team first.

Yes, that's true. If you want then I can change the three sanitizers to only one ASAN, which is more important.

@shukitchan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I was told that in other ASF projects with github actions, their PRs has to wait till a runner is available.
Perhaps we don't start off running these for every PRs? How about we start running them just every week to begin with?

@0x34d
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

0x34d commented Sep 29, 2023

I was told that in other ASF projects with github actions, their PRs has to wait till a runner is available. Perhaps we don't start off running these for every PRs? How about we start running them just every week to begin with?

The core essence of cifuzz is to find bugs in PRs before they are merged.

Comment thread .github/workflows/cifuzz.yml Outdated
@shukitchan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Also it is failing "clang-format" now. That's because there is a trailing whitespace somewhere in your latest change.

Signed-off-by: Arjun Singh <ajsinghyadav00@gmail.com>
@shukitchan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think we can give it a go.

@shukitchan shukitchan merged commit cac766d into apache:master Oct 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants