Skip to content

Proxy Verifier: use concise stack protocol specification#13003

Merged
bneradt merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
bneradt:use-pp-stack
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

Proxy Verifier: use concise stack protocol specification#13003
bneradt merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
bneradt:use-pp-stack

Conversation

@bneradt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bneradt bneradt commented Mar 19, 2026

Proxy Verifier v3.0.0 has a more concise stack configurable for protocol specification. This makes use of that over the more verbose full protocol sequence.

@bneradt bneradt added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Mar 19, 2026
@bneradt bneradt self-assigned this Mar 19, 2026
@bneradt bneradt added the AuTest label Mar 19, 2026
Proxy Verifier v3.0.0 has a more concise `stack` configurable for
`protocol` specification. This makes use of that over the more verbose
full `protocol` sequence.
@bneradt bneradt changed the title Proxy Protocol: use concise stack protocol specification Proxy Verifier: use concise stack protocol specification Mar 20, 2026
@bneradt bneradt merged commit 3e5eff6 into apache:master Mar 20, 2026
15 checks passed
@bneradt bneradt deleted the use-pp-stack branch March 20, 2026 19:28
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to For v10.2.0 in ATS v10.2.x Mar 20, 2026
bneradt added a commit to bneradt/trafficserver that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2026
Proxy Verifier v3.0.0 has a more concise `stack` configurable for
`protocol` specification. This makes use of that over the more verbose
full `protocol` sequence.

(cherry picked from commit 3e5eff6)
cmcfarlen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2026
…3016)

Proxy Verifier v3.0.0 has a more concise `stack` configurable for
`protocol` specification. This makes use of that over the more verbose
full `protocol` sequence.

(cherry picked from commit 3e5eff6)
@cmcfarlen cmcfarlen removed this from ATS v10.2.x Mar 24, 2026
@cmcfarlen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Added to milestone 10.2.0 via #13016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants