[VOTE] Adopt the New RFC Process

[tqchen]

Dear Community:

This is a formal vote to adopt the new RFC process after being discussed in the community for a while. Please see the proposed process here https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs

This is a formal voting thread for the community to adopt the new RFC process.

Please vote

Vote:
+1
0 - I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
-1 - because..

The VOTE will open for a week.

This thread is mirrored to dev@, please vote by replying to this thread

[hogepodge]

+1

[mbrookhart]

+1

[Lunderberg]

+1

One small question: Under "Tracking Issue", the tracking issue is closed "when the RFC is either completed or abandoned." Is "abandoned" the same as "postponed" in this context, or is there a distinction between them?

[junrushao]

+1

Agree with @Lunderberg on the tracking issue

[comaniac]

+1

[hogepodge]

@Lunderberg @junrushao1994 good catch, would changing "abandoned" to "postponed" resolve the ambiguity sufficiently?

[junrushao]

Thanks @hogepodge! Yeah that sounds better to me

[electriclilies]

+1 Thanks @hogepodge for your hard work on this!

[tkonolige]

+1

[Lunderberg]

@Lunderberg @junrushao1994 good catch, would changing "abandoned" to "postponed" resolve the ambiguity sufficiently?

Thank you! That resolves my question.

[jwfromm]

+1

[icemelon]

+1

[zackcquic]

+1

[zxybazh]

+1