[Hexagon] Add unit tests executing 2-d VTCM usage #10904
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
This PR requires the reduced memory footprint made in #10903 , in draft mode until it lands. |
Previously, the schedules in `test_2d_physical_buffers.py` were lowered and built into a `runtime::Module`, but were not executed.
Lunderberg
force-pushed
the
hexagon_2d_vtcm_execution
branch
from
ee33e76 to
3a91988
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Rebasing onto main following #10903 being merged into main. |
adstraw
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2022
Contributor
adstraw
left a comment
adstraw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a small PR that represents a HUGE amount of work and a monumental feature-add to TVM. Great to see transform_layout tested so extensively. Nice work @Lunderberg!
csullivan
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2022
csullivan
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2022
Contributor
Author
|
Minor update, the |
pfk-beta
pushed a commit
to pfk-beta/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2022
* [Hexagon] Add unit tests executing 2-d VTCM usage Previously, the schedules in `test_2d_physical_buffers.py` were lowered and built into a `runtime::Module`, but were not executed. * Added a missing function definition in the PR branch. * Only run test_execute on simulator in CI
mehrdadh
pushed a commit
to mehrdadh/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2022
* [Hexagon] Add unit tests executing 2-d VTCM usage Previously, the schedules in `test_2d_physical_buffers.py` were lowered and built into a `runtime::Module`, but were not executed. * Added a missing function definition in the PR branch. * Only run test_execute on simulator in CI
Lucien0
pushed a commit
to Lucien0/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2022
* [Hexagon] Add unit tests executing 2-d VTCM usage Previously, the schedules in `test_2d_physical_buffers.py` were lowered and built into a `runtime::Module`, but were not executed. * Added a missing function definition in the PR branch. * Only run test_execute on simulator in CI
altanh
pushed a commit
to altanh/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2022
* [Hexagon] Add unit tests executing 2-d VTCM usage Previously, the schedules in `test_2d_physical_buffers.py` were lowered and built into a `runtime::Module`, but were not executed. * Added a missing function definition in the PR branch. * Only run test_execute on simulator in CI
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, the schedules in
test_2d_physical_buffers.pywere lowered and built into aruntime::Module, but were not executed.