Skip to content

Conversation

@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor

@Lunderberg Lunderberg commented Aug 31, 2022

Previously, the test cases only tested TE-based schedules. This commit runs the same tests for equivalent TIR-based schedules as well. This is intended to catch Hexagon-specific regressions, such as the one resolved in #12652.

cc @mehrdadh

@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Draft PR, to be rebased on main after #12652 lands.

@Lunderberg Lunderberg force-pushed the hexagon_tir_2d_physical_shapes branch from 68f1ae7 to 37bf72a Compare August 31, 2022 18:23
@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @cconvey

Previously, the test cases only tested TE-based schedules.  This
commit runs the same tests for equivalent TIR-based schedules as
well.  This is intended to catch Hexagon-specific regressions, such as
the one resolved in apache#12652.
@Lunderberg Lunderberg force-pushed the hexagon_tir_2d_physical_shapes branch from 37bf72a to 31a65b0 Compare September 8, 2022 16:38
@Lunderberg Lunderberg marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2022 16:41
@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

After rebasing onto main, with the fix applied in #12652, all tests are passing.

Copy link
Member

@mehrdadh mehrdadh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@mehrdadh mehrdadh merged commit 9671aee into apache:main Sep 12, 2022
@Lunderberg Lunderberg deleted the hexagon_tir_2d_physical_shapes branch September 13, 2022 13:25
xinetzone pushed a commit to daobook/tvm that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2022
…che#12662)

Previously, the test cases only tested TE-based schedules.  This
commit runs the same tests for equivalent TIR-based schedules as
well.  This is intended to catch Hexagon-specific regressions, such as
the one resolved in apache#12652.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants