Skip to content

Conversation

@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor

Other than a single unit test, there are no usages of this parameter in TVM, and it significantly complicates the logic of MakePackedAPI. Similar functionality can be had by using MakeUnpackedAPI instead.

Other than a single unit test, there are no usages of this parameter
in TVM, and it significantly complicates the logic of `MakePackedAPI`.
Similar functionality can be had by using `MakeUnpackedAPI` instead.
@Mousius Mousius self-assigned this Sep 26, 2022
@Mousius
Copy link
Member

Mousius commented Sep 26, 2022

Thanks for doing this @Lunderberg, I've often wondered what this was for 🤔

@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mousius No problem! As far as I could tell from inspection (and maybe @tqchen could verify), it looks like an early-development feature that dates back at least to 2017 (#51). The usage has mostly been replaced by MakeUnpackedAPI, which wasn't present until 2021 (#8023).

@Lunderberg Lunderberg marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2022 14:43
Accidentally left an occurrence of `num_unpacked_params` in the Python
call.
@Lunderberg Lunderberg force-pushed the remove_num_unpacked_args branch from 5f2db06 to fa08230 Compare September 26, 2022 15:55
@Mousius Mousius merged commit 7a4c10c into apache:main Sep 27, 2022
@Lunderberg Lunderberg deleted the remove_num_unpacked_args branch September 27, 2022 14:39
xinetzone pushed a commit to daobook/tvm that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2022
…12892)

Other than a single unit test, there are no usages of this parameter
in TVM, and it significantly complicates the logic of `MakePackedAPI`.
Similar functionality can be had by using `MakeUnpackedAPI` instead.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants