Skip to content

Conversation

@vvchernov
Copy link
Contributor

All call_llvm_pure_intrin(...) methods were rechecked and argument corresponding number of input args was corrected for some of them. Corresponding tests were upstreamed

@tvm-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

tvm-bot commented Jan 31, 2023

Thanks for contributing to TVM! Please refer to the contributing guidelines https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/ for useful information and tips. Please request code reviews from Reviewers by @-ing them in a comment.

Generated by tvm-bot

@vvchernov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tvm-bot rerun

@junrushao
Copy link
Member

CC: @vinx13 @masahi

Copy link
Member

@masahi masahi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, I wondered why we were passing 0 to VNNI intrins and still getting correct output.

@masahi masahi merged commit 206f085 into apache:main Jan 31, 2023
@vinx13
Copy link
Member

vinx13 commented Jan 31, 2023

@masahi I found that the number of args is used to decide the arg types of the intrin, if it is not overloaded, it doesn't matter

@vvchernov vvchernov deleted the vc/intrin_arg_num_fix branch February 28, 2023 06:20
fzi-peccia pushed a commit to fzi-peccia/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
…pache#13881)

fix number of arguments in calls of llvm_pure_intrin

Co-authored-by: Valery Chernov <valery.chernov@deelvin.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants