-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
[NNVM] Enhance operator fusion for more element wise patterns #1548
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
296a050
enhanced op fusion for elu
masahi dfbfd46
don't fuse when op is opaque type
masahi b8662d9
add elu test cast
masahi c658bcc
update test
masahi 4fe634f
update test
masahi dd31822
update test
masahi 5763ccf
add explicit check for elemwise ops
masahi 874feda
add doc for algorithm
masahi 9af8646
fix for old compilers
masahi 3a3da5e
check number of nodes after fusion
masahi e0dff61
update traverse inline logic for arm cpu
masahi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What will happen if in-between nodes have parents not belonging to this block, such as skip-connection block?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My rule only applies when all in-between children nodes and the bottom node are fused by existing fusion algorithm (see my figure above). If some in-between node has more than one parent, existing fusion algorithm cannot fuse this node with other in-between nodes.
For example, if you add another parent node to the right in-between node 'ReLU' in my figure, nothing can be fused. Hope this makes sense.
Just to be sure, I check that in-between node has only one parent, here.
So for example, my rule does nothing to Resnet.