[Tensorize] Support conds depend on outer loop vars inside tensorize scope #7497
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
comaniac
reviewed
Mar 2, 2021
Contributor
|
Thanks @leeexyz |
trevor-m
pushed a commit
to trevor-m/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2021
…scope (apache#7497) * [Tensorize] Support conds depend on outer loop vars inside tensorize scope * Reformat
trevor-m
pushed a commit
to neo-ai/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2021
…scope (apache#7497) * [Tensorize] Support conds depend on outer loop vars inside tensorize scope * Reformat
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Community,
I just try to let Tensorize supports conds inside its scope. See the issue background.
In short, tensorize will be failed if the outer loop vars inside the tensorize scope because these vars are rebased and have new addresses.
@tqchen @merrymercy Can you please help to review? Thanks a lot!