Added missing function call to serialEvent example #3203
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In the example is stated that the function is run between one loop and the next, but actually the call to the function was missing. The comment also state that the response can be delayed using a delay in the loop,so I think that the way it should be is so by only adding a call to the function serialEvent as first operation in the loop. I so added this call.
agdl
changed the title
ffissore
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2015
Added missing function call to serialEvent example
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the example is stated that the function is run between one loop and the next, but actually the call to the function was missing.
The comment also state that the response can be delayed using a delay in the loop,so I think that the way it should be is so by only
adding a call to the function serialEvent as first operation in the loop. I so added this call.