Conversation
arm000
reviewed
Jan 20, 2023
|
|
||
| uart0: serial@30002000 { | ||
| compatible = "bouffalolab,uart"; | ||
| compatible = "bflb,bl808-uart"; |
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't this incompatible with the upstream bindings the Bouffalo kernel maintainer posted?
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As I understand they never made it to mainline. Plus I'm trying to integrate the latest opensbi with smaeul's patches here where he uses bl808-uart.
arm000
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2023
When unloading the SCMI core stack module, configured to use the virtio SCMI transport, LOCKDEP reports the splat down below about unsafe locks dependencies. In order to avoid this possible unsafe locking scenario call upfront virtio_break_device() before getting hold of vioch->lock. ===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.1.0-00067-g6b934395ba07-dirty #4 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- rmmod/307 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ffff000080c510e0 (&dev->vqs_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: virtio_break_device+0x28/0x68 and this task is already holding: ffff00008288ada0 (&channels[i].lock){-.-.}-{3:3}, at: virtio_chan_free+0x60/0x168 [scmi_module] which would create a new lock dependency: (&channels[i].lock){-.-.}-{3:3} -> (&dev->vqs_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&channels[i].lock){-.-.}-{3:3} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x128/0x398 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x78/0x140 scmi_vio_complete_cb+0xb4/0x3b8 [scmi_module] vring_interrupt+0x84/0x120 vm_interrupt+0x94/0xe8 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xb4/0x3d8 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x68 handle_irq_event+0x50/0xb0 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xac/0x138 generic_handle_domain_irq+0x34/0x50 gic_handle_irq+0xa0/0xd8 call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x54 do_interrupt_handler+0x8c/0x90 el1_interrupt+0x40/0x78 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x28 el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 _raw_write_unlock_irq+0x48/0x80 ep_start_scan+0xf0/0x128 do_epoll_wait+0x390/0x858 do_compat_epoll_pwait.part.34+0x1c/0xb8 __arm64_sys_epoll_pwait+0x80/0xd0 invoke_syscall+0x4c/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0x98/0x120 do_el0_svc+0x34/0xd0 el0_svc+0x40/0x98 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x98/0xc0 el0t_64_sync+0x170/0x174 to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&dev->vqs_list_lock){+.+.}-{3:3} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x128/0x398 _raw_spin_lock+0x58/0x70 __vring_new_virtqueue+0x130/0x1c0 vring_create_virtqueue+0xc4/0x2b8 vm_find_vqs+0x20c/0x430 init_vq+0x308/0x390 virtblk_probe+0x114/0x9b0 virtio_dev_probe+0x1a4/0x248 really_probe+0xc8/0x3a8 __driver_probe_device+0x84/0x190 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x110 __driver_attach+0x104/0x1e8 bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd0 driver_attach+0x2c/0x38 bus_add_driver+0x1e4/0x258 driver_register+0x6c/0x128 register_virtio_driver+0x2c/0x48 virtio_blk_init+0x70/0xac do_one_initcall+0x84/0x420 kernel_init_freeable+0x2d0/0x340 kernel_init+0x2c/0x138 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&dev->vqs_list_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&channels[i].lock); lock(&dev->vqs_list_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&channels[i].lock); *** DEADLOCK *** ================ Fixes: 42e90eb ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add a virtio channel refcount") Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222183823.518856-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
arm000
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2023
During EEH error injection testing, a deadlock was encountered in the tg3 driver when tg3_io_error_detected() was attempting to cancel outstanding reset tasks: crash> foreach UN bt ... PID: 159 TASK: c0000000067c6000 CPU: 8 COMMAND: "eehd" ... #5 [c00000000681f990] __cancel_work_timer at c00000000019fd18 #6 [c00000000681fa30] tg3_io_error_detected at c00800000295f098 [tg3] #7 [c00000000681faf0] eeh_report_error at c00000000004e25c ... PID: 290 TASK: c000000036e5f800 CPU: 6 COMMAND: "kworker/6:1" ... #4 [c00000003721fbc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8 #5 [c00000003721fbe0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3] #6 [c00000003721fc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4 ... PID: 296 TASK: c000000037a65800 CPU: 21 COMMAND: "kworker/21:1" ... #4 [c000000037247bc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8 #5 [c000000037247be0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3] #6 [c000000037247c60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4 ... PID: 655 TASK: c000000036f49000 CPU: 16 COMMAND: "kworker/16:2" ...:1 #4 [c0000000373ebbc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8 #5 [c0000000373ebbe0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3] #6 [c0000000373ebc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4 ... Code inspection shows that both tg3_io_error_detected() and tg3_reset_task() attempt to acquire the RTNL lock at the beginning of their code blocks. If tg3_reset_task() should happen to execute between the times when tg3_io_error_deteced() acquires the RTNL lock and tg3_reset_task_cancel() is called, a deadlock will occur. Moving tg3_reset_task_cancel() call earlier within the code block, prior to acquiring RTNL, prevents this from happening, but also exposes another deadlock issue where tg3_reset_task() may execute AFTER tg3_io_error_detected() has executed: crash> foreach UN bt PID: 159 TASK: c0000000067d2000 CPU: 9 COMMAND: "eehd" ... #4 [c000000006867a60] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8 #5 [c000000006867a80] tg3_io_slot_reset at c0080000026c2ea8 [tg3] #6 [c000000006867b00] eeh_report_reset at c00000000004de88 ... PID: 363 TASK: c000000037564000 CPU: 6 COMMAND: "kworker/6:1" ... #3 [c000000036c1bb70] msleep at c000000000259e6c #4 [c000000036c1bba0] napi_disable at c000000000c6b848 #5 [c000000036c1bbe0] tg3_reset_task at c0080000026d942c [tg3] #6 [c000000036c1bc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4 ... This issue can be avoided by aborting tg3_reset_task() if EEH error recovery is already in progress. Fixes: db84bf4 ("tg3: tg3_reset_task() needs to use rtnl_lock to synchronize") Signed-off-by: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230124185339.225806-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
arm000
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2023
Jakub Sitnicki says: ==================== This patch set addresses the syzbot report in [1]. Patch #1 has been suggested by Eric [2]. I extended it to cover the rest of sock_map proto callbacks. Otherwise we would still overflow the stack. Patch #2 contains the actual fix and bug analysis. Patches #3 & #4 add coverage to selftests to trigger the bug. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/00000000000073b14905ef2e7401@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANn89iK2UN1FmdUcH12fv_xiZkv2G+Nskvmq7fG6aA_6VKRf6g@mail.gmail.com/ --- v1 -> v2: v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113-sockmap-fix-v1-0-d3cad092ee10@cloudflare.com [v1 didn't hit bpf@ ML by mistake] * pull in Eric's patch to protect against recursion loop bugs (Eric) * add a macro helper to check if pointer is inside a memory range (Eric) ==================== Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.