[Wip] Differentiate write and write2 + simplify#526
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The class name and file name are inconsistent. I personally prefer UvWriteReq2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if it would be better to put the dummy buffer in this class and use a static pBuffers object. Better encapsulation probably.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Better yet. Create the dummy buffer in this class using CreateMemory. This way the only GCHandle we have to bother with is _pinUvWrite2Req.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Made change for this but can't test due to dotnet/aspnetcore#1207
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, though will have to add it to PR after Saturday (Playtest this weekend so focused on that)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sounds good to me. Good luck with the playtest!
|
Still needs a change as above |
benaadams
changed the title
|
@benaadams Still working on this? |
|
Not at the moment; would be a slight breaking change though would be weird if anyone but Kestrel took a dependency on them |
|
Going to close this and raise as an issue |
5 participants
UvWriteReq only uses pooled blocks
UvWrite2Req only has one buffer
List<GCHandle>isn't neededFrom #519