Skip to content

chore: rolling promotion dev -> main#32

Merged
namastex888 merged 6 commits intomainfrom
dev
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

chore: rolling promotion dev -> main#32
namastex888 merged 6 commits intomainfrom
dev

Conversation

@namastex888
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@namastex888 namastex888 commented Mar 30, 2026

Rolling Promotion PR

Auto-maintained rolling promotion PR from `dev` to `main`.

Process:

  • This PR is automatically created and kept open
  • Human reviews and merges when ready
  • Label `ready-to-merge` added when all checks pass

IMPORTANT: Merge with "Create a merge commit" — NEVER squash.
Squash merging breaks history sync between dev and main,
causing the next rolling PR to show all commits again.

Human approval required for merge to production.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Package renamed to @automagik/rlmx and version bumped to 0.260330.3.
    • Internal version reference updated to match the new release.
  • Chores (CI/Release)

    • Publish and release workflows updated to use the new package identity for publishing checks and tagging.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 30, 2026

Caution

Review failed

Pull request was closed or merged during review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1fd9cafe-ceaa-44e8-8021-3b66ee5e5572

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7025de8 and 5ea76f4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
  • package.json
  • src/version.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/version.ts
  • package.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Package scope/name and version were updated: package name changed to @automagik/rlmx and version bumped to 0.260330.3; corresponding exported VERSION constant and CI/release workflow references were adjusted for consistency.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Package manifest
package.json
Changed package scope/name from @namastex888/rlmx@automagik/rlmx and version from 0.4.00.260330.3.
Source version constant
src/version.ts
Updated exported VERSION constant from '0.4.0''0.260330.3'.
CI / Release workflows
.github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/release.yml
Replaced occurrences of package scope/name @namastex888/rlmx@automagik/rlmx used in publish/tag checks and npm dist-tag commands; logic unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 I nibble at tags and versions bright,
I hop the scope to automagik's light,
From point-four to two-six-oh-three-three-oh,
Small changes made — a soft, swift show! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: rolling promotion dev -> main' accurately describes the main intent of this PR, which is a rolling promotion between branches as confirmed by the PR objectives.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch dev

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants