Skip to content

Conversation

@Jint-lzxy
Copy link
Collaborator

IMO we could think about bringing nvim-bqf back. Not only does it make nvim's quickfix mode a breeze to use, but it also sidesteps some of the issues we had before, like #981. Plus, it's a plugin that loads on demand, so it shouldn't cause any side effects 😄

IMO we could think about bringing `nvim-bqf` back. Not only does
it make nvim's quickfix mode a breeze to use, but it also sidesteps
some of the issues we had before, like #23. Plus, it's a plugin
that loads on demand, so it shouldn't cause any side effects 😄
Copy link
Owner

@ayamir ayamir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree.

Copy link
Collaborator

@charliie-dev charliie-dev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@charliie-dev charliie-dev merged commit d3f32fc into main Dec 12, 2023
@charliie-dev charliie-dev deleted the feat/add-nvim_bqf branch December 12, 2023 07:44
ttbug pushed a commit to ttbug/nvimconf that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
IMO we could think about bringing `nvim-bqf` back. Not only does
it make nvim's quickfix mode a breeze to use, but it also sidesteps
some of the issues we had before, like ayamir#23. Plus, it's a plugin
that loads on demand, so it shouldn't cause any side effects 😄
singlemancombat pushed a commit to singlemancombat/nvim-config that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2023
IMO we could think about bringing `nvim-bqf` back. Not only does
it make nvim's quickfix mode a breeze to use, but it also sidesteps
some of the issues we had before, like ayamir#23. Plus, it's a plugin
that loads on demand, so it shouldn't cause any side effects 😄
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants