Conversation
|
Just a quick drive by - could you add a test? |
An easy way to do this could be to generate in a genrule a file which sets a |
Oh... maybe you meant I should make a separate test file. Happy to do so if it matters. |
UebelAndre
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh... maybe you meant I should make a separate test file. Happy to do so if it matters.
I personally think it's better to add a small and focused use use of this functionality to the test module but I'll defer to @hlopko on this one.
Otherwise looks good to me! 😄
hlopko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you so so much for a solid PR. Could you update docs of rule attributes that are affected by this PR to mention that macros are expanded?
|
It looks to me like the only issues remaining here might be small documentation / test changes, although I think I've resolved all of the comments. I don't feel strongly about any of them, so I'd suggest merging this and then changing any of those things in a follow-up, rather than leaving comments here. That will make it easier to work on a California vs. Munich schedule. |
hlopko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you so much! Looks great to me!
This fixed #801 for me.