QUALIFIED_IDENTIFIER is not SIMPLE_IDENTIFIER and duplication of CALL_CALLEE role

[zurk]

I found that QUALIFIED_IDENTIFIER is not SIMPLE_IDENTIFIER, but @vmarkovtsev say that it is supposed to be.
Also, I found duplication of CALL_CALLEE role.

How to reproduce:

from bblfsh.client import BblfshClient

filepath = "./matplotlib_example.py"
bc = BblfshClient("0.0.0.0:9432")
res = bc.parse(filepath, language='Python')
print(res)

matplotlib_example.py:

from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
plt.figure()

Output (lines 76-83):

       token: "figure"
        start_position {
          line: 2
          col: 1
        }
        roles: CALL_CALLEE
        roles: CALL_CALLEE
        roles: QUALIFIED_IDENTIFIER

The problem is in figure token. It means that we do not take into account function names during our machine learning analysis.

P.S.: Moved from bblfsh/bblfshd#82 because it is a python specific problem.

[smola]

In principle plt.figure would be a QUALIFIED_IDENTIFIER with two children plt and figure which would be SIMPLE_IDENTIFIER. At least, that was the original intent when defining these roles, but I don't know how that fits Python AST.

[juanjux]

Python doesn't make a distinction on the AST level from method calls and module calls (since modules are really object instances), so CallCallee I think is correct in this case, specially considering that is a child of a Call (assigned to the plt node).

The definition of CallCallee is:

	// CallCallee is the callable being called. It might be the name of a
	// function or procedure, it might be a method, it might a simple name
	// or qualified with a namespace.

QualifiedIdentifier is used for the Python AST Attribute node that it uses for everything dotted. I think with some annotation-fu it could also have the SimpleIdentifier role as @smola said. Now, adding QualifiedIdentifier to the parent (plt) that have already SimpleIdentifier could be tricky, but I'll take a look.

[zurk]

As I can understand:

1. CallCallee is ok in this case, but, duplication is not necessary.
2. I should get figure as SimpleIdentifier , but it is not possible now.

Please, correct me if I am wrong.
By the way, do we have some strong definitions of all roles?

[juanjux]

1. Yes and yes.
2. Yes and it should be fixable changing the annotations code.

[abeaumont]

@zurk https://godoc.org/github.com/bblfsh/sdk/uast#Role is the reference documentation for roles

[juanjux]

@zork my current task involves working with the annotations so I'll try to shoehorn this too on the next release of the driver (ETA: today or monday).

[juanjux]

All problems reported should be fixed by #54

[juanjux]

Fix is in version v0.4.5, thanks for the good report!

[zurk]

It seems not to work.

What I do to update docker:

$ docker rmi -f bblfsh/server
Untagged: bblfsh/server:latest
Untagged: bblfsh/server@sha256:995edbd4bc3f1304059670892322492d37c625ce99d749a9bd6eba60df8d3fc0
Deleted: sha256:d1d3218cfb85213b8ab865b93b2eb996e21b22b8de3081e1c8dd3d5dd8a9645d
Deleted: sha256:52960978090142da160beb362760fd3b735c6b4d65b6383993ef17d8b6df4a62
Deleted: sha256:5532368a31059f5aabdfa6834c46364d9d16fe3c985f857fb26f17a4d05cc912
Deleted: sha256:5bef08742407efd622d243692b79ba0055383bbce12900324f75e56f589aedb0
$ docker rmi -f bblfsh/server
Error response from daemon: No such image: bblfsh/server:latest

then run it.

docker run --privileged -p 9432:9432 --name bblfsh bblfsh/server

bblfsh logs:

Unable to find image 'bblfsh/server:latest' locally
latest: Pulling from bblfsh/server
88286f41530e: Pull complete
5f6338622042: Pull complete
2e6d5a920060: Pull complete
Digest: sha256:995edbd4bc3f1304059670892322492d37c625ce99d749a9bd6eba60df8d3fc0
Status: Downloaded newer image for bblfsh/server:latest
time="2017-08-04T16:54:59Z" level=info msg="binding to 0.0.0.0:9432"
time="2017-08-04T16:54:59Z" level=info msg="initializing runtime at /tmp/bblfsh-runtime"
time="2017-08-04T16:54:59Z" level=info msg="setting maximum size for sending and receiving messages to 104857600"
time="2017-08-04T16:54:59Z" level=info msg="starting gRPC server"
time="2017-08-04T16:55:22Z" level=info msg="container started bblfsh/python-driver:latest (01BPQ2RGZV0W197S3XSGHM70MF)"
time="2017-08-04T16:55:22Z" level=info msg="parsing matplotlib_example.py (50 bytes)"
proto: no encoder for Filename string [GetProperties]
proto: no encoder for Language string [GetProperties]
proto: no encoder for Content string [GetProperties]
proto: no encoder for Encoding protocol.Encoding [GetProperties]

And the output of example in the first msg is the same:

        token: "figure"
        start_position {
          line: 2
          col: 1
        }
        roles: CALL_CALLEE
        roles: CALL_CALLEE
        roles: QUALIFIED_IDENTIFIER

May be it is the same driver image but I have no idea how to check it.

[abeaumont]

@zurk could you upload the python file you're parsing somewhere?