[Merged by Bors] - Rename state_equals condition to in_state#7677
Closed
NiklasEi wants to merge 1 commit intobevyengine:mainfrom
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - Rename state_equals condition to in_state#7677NiklasEi wants to merge 1 commit intobevyengine:mainfrom
NiklasEi wants to merge 1 commit intobevyengine:mainfrom
Conversation
alice-i-cecile
added
A-ECS
alice-i-cecile
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2023
Contributor
|
would |
Member
Author
|
I think "system run if exists..." reads a bit weird. |
joseph-gio
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2023
hymm
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2023
Member
|
bors r+ |
alice-i-cecile
added
the
S-Ready-For-Final-Review
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2023
# Objective - Improve readability of the run condition for systems only running in a certain state ## Solution - Rename `state_equals` to `in_state` (see [comment by cart](#7634 (comment)) in #7634 ) - `.run_if(state_equals(variant))` now is `.run_if(in_state(variant))` This breaks the naming pattern a bit with the related conditions `state_exists` and `state_exists_and_equals` but I could not think of better names for those and think the improved readability of `in_state` is worth it.
Contributor
|
Build failed: |
Member
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2023
# Objective - Improve readability of the run condition for systems only running in a certain state ## Solution - Rename `state_equals` to `in_state` (see [comment by cart](#7634 (comment)) in #7634 ) - `.run_if(state_equals(variant))` now is `.run_if(in_state(variant))` This breaks the naming pattern a bit with the related conditions `state_exists` and `state_exists_and_equals` but I could not think of better names for those and think the improved readability of `in_state` is worth it.
Contributor
bors
bot
changed the title
myreprise1
pushed a commit
to myreprise1/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
# Objective - Improve readability of the run condition for systems only running in a certain state ## Solution - Rename `state_equals` to `in_state` (see [comment by cart](bevyengine#7634 (comment)) in bevyengine#7634 ) - `.run_if(state_equals(variant))` now is `.run_if(in_state(variant))` This breaks the naming pattern a bit with the related conditions `state_exists` and `state_exists_and_equals` but I could not think of better names for those and think the improved readability of `in_state` is worth it.
myreprise1
pushed a commit
to myreprise1/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
# Objective - Improve readability of the run condition for systems only running in a certain state ## Solution - Rename `state_equals` to `in_state` (see [comment by cart](bevyengine#7634 (comment)) in bevyengine#7634 ) - `.run_if(state_equals(variant))` now is `.run_if(in_state(variant))` This breaks the naming pattern a bit with the related conditions `state_exists` and `state_exists_and_equals` but I could not think of better names for those and think the improved readability of `in_state` is worth it.
myreprise1
pushed a commit
to myreprise1/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2023
# Objective - Improve readability of the run condition for systems only running in a certain state ## Solution - Rename `state_equals` to `in_state` (see [comment by cart](bevyengine#7634 (comment)) in bevyengine#7634 ) - `.run_if(state_equals(variant))` now is `.run_if(in_state(variant))` This breaks the naming pattern a bit with the related conditions `state_exists` and `state_exists_and_equals` but I could not think of better names for those and think the improved readability of `in_state` is worth it.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Objective
Solution
state_equalstoin_state(see comment by cart in Do not addOnUpdatesystem set toCoreSet::ApplyStateTransitions#7634 ).run_if(state_equals(variant))now is.run_if(in_state(variant))This breaks the naming pattern a bit with the related conditions
state_existsandstate_exists_and_equalsbut I could not think of better names for those and think the improved readability ofin_stateis worth it.