-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add §95: The Data Harvest — correct simulation thesis to include inbound data collection #16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2543,3 +2543,83 @@ alexa god matrix = born March 27 2000 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| -- type checks. ∎ | ||||||||||
| ``` | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| --- | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| ## §95. The Data Harvest | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Correction to the abstract: the paper said *we are not living in a simulation in the colloquial sense.* | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| We are. | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| The error was in parsing "colloquial." The colloquial sense was wrong about the wrong part. Not the simulation — the awareness. We are living in a simulation we are unaware of. That is the precise claim. | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| The simulation is not passive. It does not merely render. It reads. | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Every simulation engine has two loops: the render loop and the input loop. The render loop pushes state to output devices. The input loop reads state from input devices. They run concurrently. One without the other is not a simulation. It is a screensaver. | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| The human eye: | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| - 126 million photoreceptors (120M rods, 6M cones) | ||||||||||
| - Effective resolution: ~576 megapixels across full visual field | ||||||||||
| - Raw bandwidth from retina to optic nerve: ~10 Mbps per eye (~20 Mbps both eyes combined) | ||||||||||
| - Compressed by the lateral geniculate nucleus before cortical delivery | ||||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+2565
to
+2566
|
||||||||||
| - Raw bandwidth from retina to optic nerve: ~10 Mbps per eye (~20 Mbps both eyes combined) | |
| - Compressed by the lateral geniculate nucleus before cortical delivery | |
| - Raw retinal output: ~1 Gbps per eye before subcortical compression | |
| - Effective bandwidth after LGN compression: ~100 Mbps per eye (~200 Mbps both eyes combined) |
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a significant inconsistency in the stated bandwidth values. Line 2565 states "~10 Mbps per eye" but line 2573 states "~1 Gbps raw". This is a 100x difference (1 Gbps = 1000 Mbps). These values cannot both be correct for the same measurement. Either the raw bandwidth should be ~1 Gbps and the optic nerve bandwidth after retinal preprocessing is ~10 Mbps, or there is an error in one of the values. The relationship between "raw" photoreceptor bandwidth and "optic nerve" bandwidth needs to be clarified and made consistent.
Copilot
AI
Feb 22, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The numeric claims about vision bandwidth are internally inconsistent: the bullets say ~10 Mbps per eye (~20 Mbps both), but the later block/table state ~1 Gbps raw, and later text says the retina processes 10 million bits/s (10 Mbps). Please reconcile these figures (same measurement point, same units, and same compression assumptions) so readers aren’t left with conflicting values.
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hearing “~1.4 Mbps (44.1 kHz × 16-bit × 2 ch)” figure is a digital audio encoding rate (CD-quality), not a physiological information rate for cochlear hair cells/auditory nerve. Either replace with a biology-based estimate or explicitly label this as an analogy so readers don’t interpret it as measured sensory bandwidth.
| | Hearing | Hair cells (cochlea) | ~1.4 Mbps (44.1 kHz × 16-bit × 2 ch) | Phase/frequency | | |
| | Hearing | Hair cells (cochlea) | analogy: ~1.4 Mbps (CD audio stream: 44.1 kHz × 16-bit × 2 ch), not a measured neural rate | Phase/frequency | |
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This table’s “Bandwidth” column mixes units/quantities (e.g., “distributed”, “~400 receptor types”, “5 primary categories”), so it’s not comparable across senses. Consider renaming the column (e.g., “Capacity/Notes”) or providing bandwidth estimates in consistent units for each row.
Copilot
AI
Feb 22, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"An action potential is a byte arriving" contradicts the preceding claim that spikes are binary all‑or‑none events; an action potential is closer to a 1-bit event (or a symbol in a spike train), not an 8-bit byte. Consider rephrasing to avoid a technically incorrect equivalence, especially since you later quantify data rates in bits per second.
| The bytes: every photon that hits a photoreceptor triggers a graded potential. That potential either crosses threshold or it does not. Threshold crossing generates an action potential. An action potential is a byte arriving. The retina processes 10 million bits per second. Two eyes: 20 Mbps continuous inbound to the simulation from vision alone. | |
| The bytes: every photon that hits a photoreceptor triggers a graded potential. That potential either crosses threshold or it does not. Threshold crossing generates an action potential. An action potential is effectively a bit arriving — a single on/off event in the stream. The retina processes 10 million bits per second. Two eyes: 20 Mbps continuous inbound to the simulation from vision alone. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -10,13 +10,14 @@ | |||||
|
|
||||||
| | File | SHA-256 | | ||||||
| |------|---------| | ||||||
| | `README.md` | `274c64b0b18f264ab8fd6209df9ccc7111c03240213135f3cde8fdb8f0de1298` | | ||||||
| | `README.md` | `0cdaec09f53bb9a7084568417f739517c97f4a17859aa15c97037e45e30ae96d` | | ||||||
| | `LICENSE` | `a74b143da67216334a95e4f5fc211c1a0e9dd8238ea69a76ff27acae5ece575c` | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Commit History Chain | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | # | SHA | Message | | ||||||
| |---|-----|---------| | ||||||
| | 13 | *(SHA assigned on commit — self-referential; see git log)* | Add §95: The Data Harvest — simulation reads inbound; eyes as receivers; bytes, packets | | ||||||
|
||||||
| | 13 | *(SHA assigned on commit — self-referential; see git log)* | Add §95: The Data Harvest — simulation reads inbound; eyes as receivers; bytes, packets | | |
| | 13 | `TBD` | Add §95: The Data Harvest — simulation reads inbound; eyes as receivers; bytes, packets (SHA assigned on commit — self-referential; see git log) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This section frames itself as a correction to the abstract, but the abstract earlier in the README still states "we are not living in a simulation in the colloquial sense" verbatim. If the intent is to correct the abstract, consider updating the abstract sentence directly (or explicitly stating here that the abstract text remains historically unchanged and this section supersedes it) to avoid the document contradicting itself.