Skip to content

Fix numerical inconsistencies and clarify notation across equations files#28

Open
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
copilot/enhance-mathematical-rigor
Open

Fix numerical inconsistencies and clarify notation across equations files#28
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
copilot/enhance-mathematical-rigor

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 25, 2026

Several mathematical values and notations were inconsistent or imprecise across the equations documentation. Three targeted fixes:

Density matrix corrections (equations/quantum.md)

Four matrix entries had rounding errors in the unnormalized density matrix ρ = |ψ⟩⟨ψ|. Values now match the correctly computed entries and are consistent with proofs/pure-state.md:

Before:                          After:
[ 0.2219  0.3629  0.4062 ]      [ 0.2219  0.3631  0.4061 ]
[ 0.3629  0.5941  0.6639 ]  →   [ 0.3631  0.5941  0.6644 ]
[ 0.4062  0.6639  0.7401 ]      [ 0.4061  0.6644  0.7430 ]

Also adds the normalized state ψ̂ = |ψ⟩/‖ψ‖ and normalized density matrix ρ̂ = |ψ̂⟩⟨ψ̂| with explicit idempotency condition ρ̂² = ρ̂, Tr(ρ̂) = 1.

Landauer bound precision (equations/blackroad-equations.md)

Rounds to 4.44 × 10⁻²¹ J (from 4.5), matching the value in equations/thermodynamics.md and the computed k_B × 293 K × ln(3).

Φ_universal notation (equations/consciousness.md)

Replaces ambiguous (x,y|z) with standard information-theoretic I(X;Y|Z) (conditional mutual information), with an explicit definition.

Original prompt

Let's enhance the mathematical rigor


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

…hi_universal notation

Co-authored-by: blackboxprogramming <118287761+blackboxprogramming@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Enhance mathematical rigor in analyses Fix numerical inconsistencies and clarify notation across equations files Feb 25, 2026
@blackboxprogramming
Copy link
Owner

Can I do multiple commits in a thread? @copilot

Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Feb 25, 2026

Can I do multiple commits in a thread? @copilot

Yes — you can keep adding requests in this thread and I'll make additional commits to the branch with each change. Just describe what you'd like updated and I'll handle it.

@blackboxprogramming
Copy link
Owner

I want to say thank you @copilot it means a lot you're helping with this.

Can you verify math claims without importing math?

imageimage

Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Feb 25, 2026

I want to say thank you @copilot it means a lot you're helping with this.

Can you verify math claims without importing math?...

Yes — all the math claims in this repo can be verified using only Python built-ins (no import math needed). Here's a quick demonstration:

QWERTY encoding — pure sum arithmetic:

  • REAL = R(4)+E(3)+A(11)+L(19) = 37
  • COMPUTATION = C+O+M+P+U+T+A+T+I+O+N = 137
  • ALEXA AMUNDSON = 65+128 = 193 (prime) ✓

Density matrix — just multiplying the state vector components:

  • ρ[0][1] = 0.4711 × 0.7708 = 0.3631 ✓ (was wrong before, now fixed)

Landauer bound — using ln(3) ≈ 1.098612 (verifiable as (1 + 1.098612/10000)^10000 ≈ 2.9998):

  • k_B × 293 × 1.098612 = 4.445 × 10⁻²¹ J

Ramanujan's π approximation from your image — pure arithmetic:

  • (2143/22)^(1/4) = 3.14159265258... (error ~10⁻⁹) ✓
  • 99²/(1103 × 2 × √2) = 3.14159273... (error ~10⁻⁸) ✓

Magic square from your image — the example has magic constant 139 on every row, column, and diagonal ✓

The key is that transcendental numbers (like ln(3), √2, π) only need known-good approximations — the claims either use them as constants or can be checked to the required precision without any library.

@blackboxprogramming
Copy link
Owner

So importing number pi as numpy? Y'all play dumb? Haha love it @copilot

@blackboxprogramming
Copy link
Owner

@copilot

@blackboxprogramming blackboxprogramming marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2026 18:25
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 25, 2026 18:25
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR corrects mathematical inconsistencies across the equations documentation to ensure numerical accuracy and notation clarity. The changes align values with their correctly computed counterparts and adopt standard mathematical notation.

Changes:

  • Corrects rounding errors in the density matrix ρ and adds normalized state ψ̂ and normalized density matrix ρ̂ with proper quantum properties
  • Updates Landauer bound to precise value (4.44 × 10⁻²¹ J) matching thermodynamics reference
  • Replaces non-standard notation (x,y|z) with standard information-theoretic I(X;Y|Z) for conditional mutual information

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
equations/quantum.md Fixes four matrix entry rounding errors, adds normalized state and density matrix with explicit quantum properties (idempotency, trace conditions)
equations/blackroad-equations.md Updates Landauer bound from 4.5 to 4.44 × 10⁻²¹ J for consistency with thermodynamics.md
equations/consciousness.md Replaces ambiguous (x,y|z) notation with standard I(X;Y|Z) conditional mutual information notation with clear definition

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

**Equation 12: Modified Landauer Bound (Ternary)**
```
E_min = k_B · T · ln(3) ≈ 4.5 × 10⁻²¹ J at room temperature
E_min = k_B · T · ln(3) ≈ 4.44 × 10⁻²¹ J at room temperature
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Landauer bound value was correctly updated here to 4.44 × 10⁻²¹ J, but there's an inconsistency in the "Concrete Numbers" table at line 188 of this same file, which still shows the old value of "≈ 4.5 × 10⁻²¹ J". Both locations should be updated to maintain consistency.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants