Skip to content

Enhanced run image resolution#357

Merged
natalieparellano merged 2 commits intobuildpacks:platform/0.12from
sap-contributions:enhance-run-image-resolution
May 8, 2023
Merged

Enhanced run image resolution#357
natalieparellano merged 2 commits intobuildpacks:platform/0.12from
sap-contributions:enhance-run-image-resolution

Conversation

@c0d1ngm0nk3y
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@c0d1ngm0nk3y c0d1ngm0nk3y commented Feb 28, 2023

We would like to propose some enhancement to the run image resolution.

A possible implementation: buildpacks/lifecycle#1024

@c0d1ngm0nk3y c0d1ngm0nk3y force-pushed the enhance-run-image-resolution branch from a694c3d to 6385c28 Compare March 1, 2023 07:17
@natalieparellano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@c0d1ngm0nk3y @pbusko thanks for this! Is it possible you could fix the DCO? I think you need to use Signed-off-by instead of (or in addition to) Co-authored-by.

@c0d1ngm0nk3y c0d1ngm0nk3y force-pushed the enhance-run-image-resolution branch from b15ef28 to 1066adf Compare March 1, 2023 16:06
Co-authored-by: Ralf Pannemans <ralf.pannemans@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: Pavel Busko <pavel.busko@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Pannemans <ralf.pannemans@sap.com>
@c0d1ngm0nk3y c0d1ngm0nk3y force-pushed the enhance-run-image-resolution branch from 1066adf to 988d4a1 Compare March 1, 2023 16:09
@sambhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

sambhav commented Mar 9, 2023

@natalieparellano could you help retarget this to an appropriate branch?

@natalieparellano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

natalieparellano commented Mar 9, 2023

@samj1912 sounds good. Should we be guarding this change in behavior on a Platform API version in the lifecycle? Or should this be treated more like a bug-fix and back-ported to older platforms?

@natalieparellano natalieparellano changed the base branch from main to platform/0.12 March 9, 2023 21:47
Co-authored-by: Ralf Pannemans <ralf.pannemans@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Pannemans <ralf.pannemans@sap.com>
@c0d1ngm0nk3y c0d1ngm0nk3y force-pushed the enhance-run-image-resolution branch from 988d4a1 to d3069b8 Compare March 14, 2023 12:24
@c0d1ngm0nk3y
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

What is missing for this to be merged?

@natalieparellano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe this now has enough votes. @buildpacks/toc any further thoughts?

@c0d1ngm0nk3y
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I believe this now has enough votes. @buildpacks/toc any further thoughts?

???

@natalieparellano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

natalieparellano commented May 2, 2023

I've put this on the agenda for this week's CNB Working Group. I don't see any controversy here, but I'd like clarity on this question:

Should we be guarding this change in behavior on a Platform API version in the lifecycle? Or should this be treated more like a bug-fix and back-ported to older platforms?

@natalieparellano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Just to circle back here, the consensus from Working Group is that this should be safe to treat as a bug-fix.

@natalieparellano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Merging as this has all required approvals.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants