Enhanced run image resolution#357
Conversation
a694c3d to
6385c28
Compare
|
@c0d1ngm0nk3y @pbusko thanks for this! Is it possible you could fix the DCO? I think you need to use |
b15ef28 to
1066adf
Compare
Co-authored-by: Ralf Pannemans <ralf.pannemans@sap.com> Co-authored-by: Pavel Busko <pavel.busko@sap.com> Signed-off-by: Ralf Pannemans <ralf.pannemans@sap.com>
1066adf to
988d4a1
Compare
|
@natalieparellano could you help retarget this to an appropriate branch? |
|
@samj1912 sounds good. Should we be guarding this change in behavior on a Platform API version in the lifecycle? Or should this be treated more like a bug-fix and back-ported to older platforms? |
Co-authored-by: Ralf Pannemans <ralf.pannemans@sap.com> Signed-off-by: Ralf Pannemans <ralf.pannemans@sap.com>
988d4a1 to
d3069b8
Compare
|
What is missing for this to be merged? |
|
I believe this now has enough votes. @buildpacks/toc any further thoughts? |
??? |
|
I've put this on the agenda for this week's CNB Working Group. I don't see any controversy here, but I'd like clarity on this question:
|
|
Just to circle back here, the consensus from Working Group is that this should be safe to treat as a bug-fix. |
|
Merging as this has all required approvals. |
We would like to propose some enhancement to the run image resolution.
A possible implementation: buildpacks/lifecycle#1024