CI: switch to AArch64 macOS runners.#7129
CI: switch to AArch64 macOS runners.#7129cfallin wants to merge 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
Conversation
cfallin
requested review from
alexcrichton and
pchickey
and removed request for
a team
|
Tagging @alexcrichton for review as the CI machinery is a dark and twisty maze that I don't pretend to understand very well. Per the announcement, we're supposed to be able to get the new runners by just naming |
cfallin
force-pushed
the
macos-aarch64-runners
branch
from
3f9d08f to
3bae49b
Compare
This should result in faster builds for macOS, and additionally will let us actually run tests on aarch64-macos now (previously we only had binary builds). Fixes bytecodealliance#4177. prtest:full
cfallin
force-pushed
the
macos-aarch64-runners
branch
from
3bae49b to
be35ff5
Compare
|
Alas I believe this is a paid feature we don't have access to:
from here |
|
Ah, that explains the "This job failed" with no log in the CI job view. Too bad! |
|
(I'll leave this open for now; maybe we can find a way to get these resources for the BA org...) |
|
BTW M1 runners are now free for public repos: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-introducing-the-new-m1-macos-runner-available-to-open-source |
Rebase of bytecodealliance#7129 with the `macos-14` string which GitHub indicates should now work for public repos. prtest:full
|
Oh nice! I've posted #7914 to see how well it works |
* Test with aarch64 macOS on CI Rebase of #7129 with the `macos-14` string which GitHub indicates should now work for public repos. prtest:full * Fix syntax
|
This was landed vicariously in #7914 so I'm going to close this out now (yay more testing!) |
3 participants
This should result in faster builds for macOS, and additionally will let us actually run tests on aarch64-macos now (previously we only had binary builds).
Fixes #4177.
prtest:full