Improve some logging in the differential fuzzer#9982
Merged
alexcrichton merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom Jan 13, 2025
Merged
Improve some logging in the differential fuzzer#9982alexcrichton merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
alexcrichton merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
Conversation
Clearly show "lhs" and "rhs" more often and then also swap the order of the arguments in `assert_error_match` to match the "lhs" and "rhs" terminology of the original execution.
github-actions
bot
added
the
fuzzing
Subscribe to Label Actioncc @fitzgen DetailsThis issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the |
abrown
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2025
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Clearly show "lhs" and "rhs" more often and then also swap the order of the arguments in
assert_error_matchto match the "lhs" and "rhs" terminology of the original execution.