Fix extra ipv6 issues, code reduction and simplification#1243
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
@eb3095 , changes look good. Would you be able to add a couple unit tests for this behavior? I think the last PR with the missing continue/return shows we could use some extra unit test coverage for this datasource. |
Contributor
Author
Ha, fair, indeed it could use a few more tests I think. I'll add that. |
Contributor
Author
|
Alright, I added tests for all the recent failures and this latest one. |
8888c0d to
b2936eb
Compare
b2936eb to
27fb5c2
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
OK This should be good to go now! |
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed Commit Message
Fix extra ipv6 issues, code reduction and simplification
Test Steps
Start a Vultr vm with additional IPv6's added to the instance.
Checklist: