generated from amazon-archives/__template_Apache-2.0
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
Adds annotation support for Policy #296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
muditchaudhary
merged 9 commits into
cedar-policy:main
from
muditchaudhary:addsPolicyAnnotations
Feb 25, 2025
+459
−12
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cb60e73
add jMap
jtbrain e6a26a9
adds get annotation FFI methods for static policy
muditchaudhary 308ba8f
adds into_inner for jmap
muditchaudhary 917376d
adds annotation support for static policies
muditchaudhary 6cc1cf3
adds annotation support for templates
muditchaudhary 7cb6f3f
adds FFI tests for jmap and policy annotation methods
muditchaudhary 26f9973
adds get annotation by key for Policy
muditchaudhary d242498
adds tests for Policy annotation support
muditchaudhary 4993861
adds track_caller for test utility method in FFI
muditchaudhary File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any reason we can't include this snippet of code that should be run once per instance in the constructor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This snippet throws an
InternalException, but the current constructor doesn't declare this exception. Moving this code into the constructor would require us to either addthrows InternalExceptionto the constructor signature, which would be a breaking change for existing users.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, good reason for this major version at least 👍