Skip to content

Conversation

@jcstein
Copy link
Member

@jcstein jcstein commented Dec 15, 2025

Overview

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jcstein, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on updating the documentation related to node specifications. Specifically, it revises the CPU requirements for bridge nodes to reflect a higher core count. This ensures that the published guidelines are accurate and provide users with the most current information for provisioning their infrastructure.

Highlights

  • Documentation Update: The CPU requirement for 'Bridge nodes' has been updated in the how-to-guides/nodes-overview.md file.
  • Increased CPU Cores: The recommended CPU for 'Bridge nodes' has been increased from '8 cores' to '32 cores' in both the non-archival and archival node requirement tables.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 15, 2025

PR Preview Action v1.6.3
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2025-12-16 15:01 UTC

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the CPU requirements for bridge nodes from 8 cores to 32 cores in the nodes-overview.md documentation. The change is applied to both non-archival and archival bridge nodes, making their requirements consistent with other node types like validator and consensus nodes, and aligning with the general recommendation of 32 or more cores mentioned in the same document. The changes are correct and improve the consistency of the documentation. I have no specific comments on the changes.

@jcstein jcstein self-assigned this Dec 15, 2025
@jcstein jcstein merged commit c19d549 into main Dec 16, 2025
8 checks passed
@jcstein jcstein deleted the jcs/32-cores branch December 16, 2025 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants