fix(deps): update dependency jaeger-client to ~3.13.0

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change	References
jaeger-client	dependencies	minor	~3.10.0 -> ~3.13.0	source

---

Release Notes

jaegertracing/jaeger-client-node

v3.13.0

Compare Source

• Support TLS in HTTP Sender (#​294) - thanks Ben Keith @​keitwb
• Support ENV variables for configuration (#​296) - thanks Eundoo Song @​eundoosong

v3.12.0

Compare Source

• Rename "throttler-update" metric (#​279) - thanks @​yknx4
• Add HTTP Sender (#​280) - thanks @​keitwb

v3.11.0

Compare Source

• Add throttler (#​246)
• Use throttler for rate limiting (#​248)
• Make metrics consistent with Go/Java clients (#​255) - thanks @​eundoosong
• Pass logger/metrics option to remote sampler, reporter (#​257) - thanks @​eundoosong
• Update RateLimiter to scale credits on update (#​264)
• Replace Coveralls by Codecov (#​269) - thanks @​eundoosong
• Add PrometheusMetricsFactory (#​262) - thanks @​eundoosong
• Upgrade flow to v0.75 (#​272) - thanks @​TLadd
• Pass object to prom-client metric to fix warning (#​274) - thanks @​eundoosong

---

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: "after 9am and before 3pm" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR is stale, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot. View repository job log here.

[googlebot]

So there's good news and bad news.

👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there.

😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request.

Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the cla/google commit status will not change from this state. It's up to you to confirm consent of all the commit author(s), set the cla label to yes (if enabled on your project), and then merge this pull request when appropriate.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #241 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #241   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.41%   95.41%           
=======================================
  Files          58       58           
  Lines        3841     3841           
  Branches      276      276           
=======================================
  Hits         3665     3665           
  Misses        176      176

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 542c4ec...251a32f. Read the comment docs.

[googlebot]

A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good.

(Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.)

[googlebot]

So there's good news and bad news.

👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there.

😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request.

Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the cla/google commit status will not change from this state. It's up to you to confirm consent of all the commit author(s), set the cla label to yes (if enabled on your project), and then merge this pull request when appropriate.

[googlebot]

A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good.

(Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.)