-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Open
Description
Hello,
Thanks for presenting your awesome EO-NeRF work! I had a few questions on part of the EO-NeRF paper.
In Section 4.2, you stated:
"It should be noted that the MVS surface models in Figures 8 and 9 present incomplete regions (in black) beyond the water zones (also in black), which we ignore to compute the altitude MAE. As explained in Figure 9, for a fair comparison, we remove surface points non-observed by the majority of cameras before computing the altitude error."
and in the Figure 9 description:
"...(b) EO-NeRF prediction at points observed by more than 3/4 of all input cameras...The altitude MAE is computed using the surface points in (b)."
My questions from this are:
- Are you creating a mask from the incomplete regions and applying it to your methods (EO-NeRF and Sat-NeRF)? or just to PSM? From the section 4.2 statement mentioned above, it seems like its being applied only to PSM, but the Fig 9 description suggests that it's being applied to EO-NeRF predictions as well.
- I understand that you are masking out water regions from the CLS tiffs provided through IEEE DFC19, but how are you computing these secondary masks based on incomplete regions?
- Can you make these "incomplete region" masks available on your google drive so that I and others can use them for our evaluation?
- Can you make the final EO-NeRF DSMs (no water masks nor "incomplete region" masks applied) available on your google drive as well?
Thanks,
Ryan
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels